AI Rate Professor

English

Jason Schneider

1C · ENGLISH1C · WRD102 · ENG1C · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Strong pick for English/writing if he is still teaching; expect and an .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFair graderInteresting discussionsPatientHilariousStudent-focused
  • Students , and excellent at facilitating discussion.
  • Class is engaging with and peer .
  • , though many reviews are older and brief.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Students call him a ; one notes an A and another a B+ with difficulty often moderate.

All grade and fairness comments are from in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Average difficulty around 3.2 with ; content is manageable for most writing students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

; most older reviews do not clarify policy.

Only the 2022 WRD102 .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

100% would-take-again when stated and multiple rave reviews call him the .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Repeatedly described as a and provides chances to do well.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and peer editing appear; not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and strong facilitation dominate the reviews.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

, and discussions are the main work mentioned more than formal exams.

Format shift

Assessment details are sparse and in-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person WRD/ENG courses praised as interesting, fair, and and .

Main concern

Many reviews are old and light on current logistics details.

What students said

“Mr Schneider was a good professor & fair. Very explanatory and patient.”
WRD102
“This is the .”
1C
“ and extremely fair. I enjoyed the class discussions.”
ENGLISH1C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and discussions; they do not clearly prove proctored or closed-book exam policies.

Homework weeklyPeer editingDiscussion-based

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments highlight weekly homework and peer .

Homework every weekPeer editing
“ , and lots of help from hie.”
1C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting fairness and engaging teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“This is the quintessential professor. Made calss very interesting. This is the .”

👍 Recommendation

92/100

“At the end of the class, I have to !”

⚖️

72/100

“i thought he was a and communicated well with the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very explanatory and patient.
  • He's great at facilitating the class.
  • and made the class a fun place to be.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • and extremely fair.
  • He wants his students to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly positive reviews with 100% take-again where known, but several are short and from 2005-2012, limiting currency.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGLISH1C2 reviews
WRD1022 reviews
1C1 review
ENG1C1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values