AI Rate Professor

English

Lisa Geren

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL36 · ENG36 · ENGLISH1A · ENGWR300 · ENG300 · ENGWR1C · ENGL1AW34382 · ENG54 · ENGLISH1 · ENG1C · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you need intensive writing critique and can tolerate chaos, late grades, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnorganizedTough GraderHeavy Paper LoadOff-Topic LecturesChronic Late Grading
  • Most students call her unorganized with and .
  • Lectures often drift into politics or her nonprofit instead of English content.
  • A minority who seek one-on-one help say she can improve their writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

, and unclear criteria mean an A takes sustained effort and luck with .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

and many papers make content feel .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and note she tracks class presence inconsistently.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Most students urge others not to take her , and off-topic classes.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; students report harsh marks, lost work, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

SO MANY PAPERS, heavy reading, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Frequent reports of unprepared lectures, off-topic rants, and little useful classroom structure.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade weight sits on many papers and essays more than transparent exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English classes are widely described as , and off-syllabus, with and uneven fairness.

Main concern

, and lectures that ignore the syllabus.

What students said

“Assigned tons of work without giving due dates, rants about politics and her non profit constantly, and almost never submitted grades until the last day of the semester.”
ENG300
“Her lectures are pointless, because they always ended up being about how her nonprofit is the most amazing thing ever.”
ENGLISH1A
“Unorganized. Even though I passed by 100% score on my final and turned all my assignments, she gave me a D on the class.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one final mentioned but .

In-Person FinalPaper-Heavy AssessmentUnclear Exam Weight

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; finals and essays are mentioned without proctoring detail.

In-Person FinalEssay-Heavy Coursework
“Even though I passed by 100% score on my final and turned all my assignments, she gave me a D on the class.”
ENG1A
“final was worth 50 points but so didnt matter ”
ENGLISH1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person , and mixed mentoring. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Was never prepared for class. Deviated from syllabus. .”

📝 Workload Load

26/100

“Assigned tons of work without giving due dates... SO MANY PAPERS”

🚫 Recommendation

36/100

“ !!”

⏱️

28/100

“almost never submitted grades until the last day of the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are pointless, because they always ended up being about how her nonprofit is the most amazing thing ever.
  • talks about irrelevant topics during classtime.
  • Was never prepared for class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !! Made passing Eng 1A WAY more difficult than necessary.
  • She took , and grades.
  • she gave me a D on the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's a , and cares about student success.
  • really helpful and will spend time working with you after class
  • She will show you your weaknesses and help u better yourself as a writer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

24 detailed in-person reviews spanning 2011-2017 with consistent themes of disorganization and heavy papers.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENGLISH1A5 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
ENG3002 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISH12 reviews
ENGWR3002 reviews
ENG361 review
ENG541 review
ENGL1AW343821 review
ENGL361 review
ENGWR1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2