AI Rate Professor

English

S.N. Derry

ENL1C · ENG105L · ENG51 · ENG3 · ENG4861 · ENG105 · ENG1C · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Avoid if you have other options; class can be easy but instruction quality is widely criticized.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRambles off topicUnclear expectationsPersonal storiesMixed helpEasy if you attend
  • Most students say , and unhelpful.
  • Coursework itself is often described as fairly easy if you just do the work.
  • A minority defend her as nice and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Multiple reviews say the class is pretty easy if you attend and complete the work.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is generally not described as intellectually hard; complaints focus on delivery, not rigor.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Students say attending and doing the work keeps you okay, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most reviews advise against taking her unless .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Assignments are called okay and the class is often easy, without strong claims of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Students repeatedly frame the course as easy work-wise when they simply complete assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and students teaching each other.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments center on assignments and class .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English students , and limited teaching value, with a few nicer defenses.

Main concern

and classroom tangents can waste class time and confuse students.

What students said

“She gives you an assignment but .”
ENG51
“The students teach each other because she doesn't.”
ENG105
“ if you ask for the assistance and i never witnessed her trying to humiliate a student.”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a and mainly discuss assignments and class time.

Assignment-focusedLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and instead emphasize assignments and attendance.

Assignment-focusedLimited exam evidence
“Just do the work and attend class and you will be OK.”
ENG105
“ ...”
ENL1C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I think Derry is one of the . I took her during the evening's and it was terrible. this class should only be taken if none other is availible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting unclear teaching, easy workload, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🗣️ Off-Topic Teaching

28/100

“She likes to ramble on and on. The students teach each other because she doesn't.”

📗 Easy If You Do Work

76/100

“Her class is pretty easy but if it wasnt the .”

🚫 Low Recommendation

24/100

“this class should only be taken if none other is availible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She likes to ramble on and on
  • side tracks a
  • goes on tangents about her own life

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is pretty easy
  • Just do the work and attend class and you will be OK

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She berates students in front of everyone
  • not an enjoyable class
  • because they couldn't understand her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Ten multi-year in-person reviews show a consistent negative teaching pattern with only a few defenses.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG513 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
ENG1051 review
ENG105L1 review
ENG31 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG48611 review
ENL1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values