AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Zachary Agoff

PHIL6 · PHIL1 · PHIL2 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take Agoff if you want a without crushing difficulty.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesClear grading criteriaCaringWriting guidelinesEngaging discussions
  • Students call him one of the and .
  • and solid lectures make philosophy approachable.
  • Workload is manageable with a few writing assignments and some participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

, and reported A/B+ grades make strong marks reachable without extreme grind.

; the single in-person review still recommends him highly.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Philosophy ideas are made understandable; a few writing tasks and journaling add moderate challenge.

Online called not hard; in-person notes journaling as something to expect.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Online reports both no and yes for ; in-person listed yes.

Online mixed; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

All four and rate quality at 5.

Strong praise online and in the one in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

and + range.

Format shift

Online highlights specific guidelines; and discussion.

Workload

Light

72/100

A handful of writing assignments and discussions keep load reasonable.

Format shift

Online cites four writing assignments; in-person adds journaling.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

, and engaged discussion define the small sample.

Format shift

Both formats highly positive with only four reviews total.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Writing assignments, discussions, and journaling drive the .

Format shift

Online writing-heavy; in-person journaling and discussion emphasized.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One , and journaling as the main watch-out.

Main concern

Journaling may feel unfamiliar for some students.

What students said

“Professor Agoff was very engaging, discussions were encouraged in class which helped everyone to understand even further.”
phil-2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online , and specific writing guidelines on a few assignments.

Main concern

Still need to follow detailed writing guidelines closely for full credit.

What students said

“If you have an ! Dr. Agoff is the best professor I've had, across all disciplines.”
phil-1
“Has really good lectures. Not hard. to understand”
Phil-6
“We had 4 writing assignments that weren't too hard, he has very specific guidelines for them”
phil-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on guided writing and participation; reviews do not describe strict proctored exams.

Writing assignmentsDiscussion participationClear guidelinesNo proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment includes class discussion and journaling; .

Class discussionsJournalingCanvas responsive
“In this class he did assign journaling which others may not be used to so I'd say that's one thing to look out for”
phil-2

Online

Online work includes timed lectures, participation discussions, and a few guided writing assignments.

4 writing assignmentsSpecific guidelinesOnline lectures 20-40 min
“We had 4 writing assignments that weren't too hard, he has very specific guidelines for them so if you follow those closely you'll do fine.”
phil-1
“Has really good lectures. Not hard.”
Phil-6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have an ! Dr. Agoff is the best professor I've had, across all disciplines.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching quality and writing load. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Dr. Agoff is the .”

🧠

90/100

“ to understand while also extracting key ideas efficiently.”

👍 Recommendation

97/100

“Take this class!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's extremely accommodating and caring, while still pushing students to do and .
  • Has really good lectures. Not hard.
  • Professor

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • We had 4 writing assignments that weren't too hard
  • He has very specific guidelines for them so if you follow those closely you'll do fine.
  • he did assign journaling which others may not be used to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent all-5 quality reviews are consistent but too few for high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

phil-12 reviews
phil-21 review
Phil-61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values