AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Sujan Burgeson

HUM10 · PHIL20 · HUM20 · PHILO1 · WORLDRELIGIONS · WORLDMYTHOLOGY · HUM11 · M6333 · PHILO2 · HUMAN10 · HUMAN31 · HUMANITIES · 103 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
22.45%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless you need this specific course and and videos.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTrick QuizzesYouTube LecturesHeavy ReadingMismatch Tests
  • Quizzes and videos.
  • and subjective on written work and discussions.
  • but still advise avoiding the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A usually needs near-perfect quiz performance and very precise .

; some older in-person reviews mention saving the grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content is intro-level humanities, but and dense weekly work make it feel much harder.

Both formats complain about difficulty; online comments are more consistently severe.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

68/100

Many online , though readings and weekly tasks still pile up.

Online is often attendance-optional; and sometimes mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

warnings despite occasional praise for kindness.

Negativity is strong in both formats, with online reviews especially harsh.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and quiz averages are often very low.

Format shift

Online students report almost no As or Bs on quizzes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and long discussion responses are common.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are especially frequent and intense.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students often like her personally but , and mismatched assessments.

Format shift

A minority of in-person reviews are warmer; recent online tone is worse.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes and .

Format shift

Both formats are quiz- and test-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person still leans on videos and and uneven lecture clarity.

Main concern

, and some students report unprofessional moments.

What students said

“Everybody struggled in her tests and quizzes because the questions did not match the actual content at all.”
PHILO1
“What she teaches in class has nothing to do with .”
HUM10
“Run, very unprofessional”
HUMANITIES

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

- and video-heavy with hard subjective quizzes and .

Main concern

, and full credit on writing is rare.

What students said

“BEWARE! This professor is impossible to please. .”
HUMAN10
“Questions are hand typed and VERY subjective. .”
PHILO1
“ and write over a page and a half for a simple assigment and recieve "3/10".”
HUM10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are widely described as tricky, subjective, and poorly aligned with readings or videos.

Trick Multiple ChoiceSelect All That ApplySubjective QuestionsPop QuizzesMismatch With Materials

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, with pop quizzes mentioned.

Mismatch TestsPop QuizzesStudy Guides Unhelpful
“I studied off her study guides so many times and the information the study guide had.”
HUM10
“ provided materials”
PHILO1

Online

Online quizzes use multi-select and subjective items, often without review of missed answers.

Subjective QuizzesSelect All That ApplyNo Review Of Missed Items
“the multiple-choice questions are full of tricks and "select all of the correct answers" type of questions.”
PHILO1
“No way to view missed questions afterwards, so you can't even see or learn from your mistakes.”
HUMAN10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting grading harshness and . Credibility rating: High.

⚠️

18/100

“ ... write over a page and a half... and recieve "3/10".”

📉 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“If you have the option- please stay away from this professor at all costs”

🧪 Test Mismatch

28/100

“the questions did not match the actual content at all.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Too much work + effort for intro class... ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ALL of her lecture videos consist of YouTube videos.
  • She's spacey, forgetful
  • She is an amazing professor... .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tests and .
  • No answers were good enough.
  • She's a nice lady, but a and I wouldn't have gotten an A without the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor is overall very kind as a person
  • Run, very unprofessional
  • Super sweet ! The class wasnt hard you just have to keep up

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

103

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with and and in-person formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 516
3 out of 513
2 out of 527
1 out of 523

Course coverage

PHILO114 reviews
HUM1013 reviews
HUMAN106 reviews
HUM115 reviews
HUM203 reviews
Show 7 more courses
PHIL203 reviews
HUMAN311 review
HUMANITIES1 review
M63331 review
PHILO21 review
WORLDMYTHOLOGY1 review
WORLDRELIGIONS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 5 · A 10 · A- 4

B range

5

B 3 · B- 2

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 2