AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Christopher Noffsinger

MATH1A · M4414 · NOFFSINGER10717 · STATS1 · M2441 · MATH1B · MATH50 · MATH52 · 154 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him only if and ; many prefer another section for Calc 2.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy HomeworkHard ExamsNo CalculatorPolarizing MathOffice Hours Helpful
  • Workload and exam strictness, especially in Calc 2, define the experience.
  • and real willingness to help outside class.
  • Critics report useless , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

As are uncommon; and , and often unlike practice.

Nearly all evidence is in person; online sample is too small to change the picture.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Calc and Stats under him demand constant practice; lectures help but the content and pace still bite.

In-person Calc 2 drives most difficulty complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and falling behind on lectures or .

In-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; strong praise for teaching is offset by intense workload and .

Online sample is thin; in-person reviews are highly polarized by course level.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Many report docking for tiny errors, limited formula help, and .

Format shift

A few Stats students call him more lenient; Calc 2 reviews do not.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

the same day as tests.

Format shift

Heavy-HW theme .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

; unprepared, disengaged, or rude for others, depending on term and course.

Format shift

Positive and negative camps are both large in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

; practice sets often feel unlike real tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person ranges from favorite and .

Main concern

MATH1B reviews repeatedly cite excessive HW, no calculator or notes, and .

What students said

“Noffsinger was by far the . He made Statistics easy and fun”
STATS1
“No notes or calculators were allowed on the exams and you were given a formula sheet which made no sense.”
MATH1B
“I have never felt so overwhelmed by a class before. This professor assigns an unreasonable amount of homework”
MATH1B

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Sparse online and slow, painful summer or Calc experiences.

Main concern

and mismatched exams appear in negative online reports.

What students said

“He is an amazing professor! I took his online Stats-1 class and I had a great time.”
STATS1
“ ... the actual exam were completely different”
MATH52
“This math class is no joke - be ready for a heavy workload and .”
MATH1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

sheet and tighter time than students expect.

No CalculatorNo NotesProvided Formula SheetLong Timed ExamsPractice Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and calculators, use a , and run long.

No CalculatorNo NotesUseless Formula SheetLong Exams
“No notes or calculators were allowed on the exams and you were given a formula sheet which made no sense.”
MATH1B
“Test and .”
MATH1B

Online

Few online comments; one Stats student was positive while .

Hard Online ExamsSlow Feedback
“I put all my time and effort on practice exams & quizzes but it was no help at all since the ”
MATH52

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lots of homework and teacher or a sanity-breaker.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting homework load and . Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Overload

24/100

“They pile on so everything.”

🎯

55/100

“He's one of the and actually breaks down why things happen.”

🧪

32/100

“No notes or calculators were allowed on the exams and you were given a formula sheet which made no sense.”

👍 Recommendation Depends

52/100

“Noffsinger was by far the . He made Statistics easy and fun to understand”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He would show up to class so unprepared to teach the material
  • He is amazing, interesting and knowledgeable Professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The formula sheet he gives is one of the most useless things you may ever touch
  • Lots of homework but gives you ample time to complete it all.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • his way to help his students.
  • Disrespectful and rude to some people in classes.
  • He's flexible and understanding if you fall behind.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

154

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with a large in-person sample and consistent MATH1B workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 574
4 out of 532
3 out of 520
2 out of 58
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MATH1B14 reviews
STATS114 reviews
MATH5210 reviews
MATH1A5 reviews
NOFFSINGER107173 reviews
Show 3 more courses
M24412 reviews
M44141 review
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

14

B+ 5 · B 6 · B- 3

C range

10

C+ 5 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 4