AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Claire Eberhardt

HUMAN5 · HIST17A · S2823 · HIST5A · HUMAN5D9712 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Do not enroll if you have any alternative; this is a high-stress, low-support experience almost no student recommends.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDoesn't grade until endHarsh timed examsHeavy busyworkHostile classroom toneAvoid at all costs
  • delayed or end.
  • Workload is , and timed multi-essay exams with too little time.
  • Many describe disrespectful or passive-aggressive behavior, foul language, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some finish with A or B, but only after crushing work, harsh scoring, and .

Both online and in-person describe brutal effort; a few still report A grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

, and timed essay-heavy exams make content and pace feel punishing.

; in-person adds classroom tension and catch-up difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and note it is hard to catch up after missing class.

A few in-person and online entries say no or not provided, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and comments repeatedly say never take any of her classes.

and in-person reviews with equal intensity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Tough grader is the default tag; and .

Format shift

Same harsh pattern online and in person.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

, and high-stakes exams stack into constant overload.

Format shift

Online and in-person both report months of unread work and huge weekly load.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe unclear teaching, slow or , and almost no constructive support.

Format shift

One older online note said class can be easy if you do the work; nearly all others are scathing.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test-heavy design with long timed exams, essays, and vocab .

Format shift

Online especially stresses timed multi-essay exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews hammer late grading, unclear instructions, harsh deductions, and a hostile or demeaning classroom climate.

Main concern

Emotional climate plus end-of-term grading blackouts that can sink the grade.

What students said

“waits till the last day of the ”
HUMAN5
“ ”
Hist-17a
“uses foul language in class”
HUMAN5

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections pile timed essay exams, unread heavy work, missing materials, and .

Main concern

grades.

What students said

“Assigns so much work she doesn't even grade”
HUMAN5
“the exams were SO hard with not nearly enough time to complete”
Hist-17a
“Only 2 hours for exams and that was not NEARLY enough”
HUMAN5D9712

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

time and little room to recover from harsh scoring.

Timed essay examsInsufficient timeVocab paragraph prepTest heavyHarsh grading

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

timed essays without paste-back, under severe time pressure.

40 vocab paragraphs3 essay questions1.5 hour limitHarsh feedback
“She gave you 40 vocab words that you had to write a paragraph each for prior to the exam, and then there was 3 essay questions”
Hist-5a
“She only gave us an hour and a half to do it, and we couldn't copy and paste the paragraphs we already wrote”
Hist-5a

Online

and term writing under tight clocks and .

Timed examsEssay questionsHeavy homeworkSlow grading
“with only 1hr40min to do 4 paragraphs on terms and 3 short essays”
HUMAN5
“Oh my god, the ”
HUMAN5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If CLASSES.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews (9 online, 19 in person) with . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“IF .”

⏳

12/100

“She doesn't grade anything until the end of the semester when grades are due.”

😰

18/100

“ and your timed!”

💢 Classroom Climate

10/100

“Nobody asks questions because they don't want to be degraded in front of the class.”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload

  • Requires weekly handwritten submitted lecture notes
  • Tons of
  • This doubled the time of homework

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • Only 2 hours for exams and that was not NEARLY enough
  • I was never

Theme 3

😤 About Tone & Support

  • Extremely disrespectful language to students
  • passive aggressive for no reason
  • I was honestly scared to ask any questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight recent detailed reviews , and tone, so confidence is high.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 527

Course coverage

HUMAN516 reviews
Hist-17a5 reviews
HUMAN5D97124 reviews
Hist-5a2 reviews
S28231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 5 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2