AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Heidi Anderson

HUM10 · HUMANITIES10 · HUMAN11 · PHIL20 · HUM11 · HIST17A · HIST17B · HUMAN10 · D9702 · C0421 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you can spare 5-10 hours a week for dense writing and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSo Many PapersGet Ready To ReadTough GraderHeavy Weekly WorkloadPeer Reviews
  • Online , and peer reviews that many call unreasonable.
  • Grades can still land as A if you finish everything, but the effort and picky formatting feel punitive.
  • Older in-person history praise contrasts with recent online complaints about rudeness, slow responses, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Many students still earn As or A+s, but only after heavy weekly writing, strict formatting, and long reading loads.

Online reviews stress massive effort for the A; the and more rewarding.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and multi-essay weeks make the intellectual and time load feel high.

Challenge is driven mainly by online writing and reading load; in-person comments focus more on engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

as mandatory in both formats, though some .

Online comments vary between mandatory and optional; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

, but recent online reviews strongly warn against the workload and interpersonal friction.

Recent ; older in-person reviews are enthusiastically positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and picky formatting tags dominate, even though a minority call her an if work is complete.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize picky grading; .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly report multi-essay weeks, 5-10 hour weekly loads, long readings, and peer-review overhead.

Format shift

Workload complaints are almost entirely from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Many online students say she outsources lectures, responds slowly, and is rude, while a few and inspiring.

Format shift

Online quality is often rated 1-2; both in-person reviews rate teaching at 5.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment , and long reading responses rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online evidence is assignment-heavy; and perspective-based work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and emphasize perspective-based teaching rather than date memorization.

Main concern

Very small sample; positive history experience may not match current online writing load.

What students said

“I really enjoyed this class, History had never been interesting until I took it with Prof. Anderson.”
HIST17A
“Professor Anderson is an Absolutely Amazing Teacher.”
C0421

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online Humanities and related , and strict source rules with uneven support.

Main concern

Overwhelming workload, tough or , and little original lecture content.

What students said

“Honestly made me hate my life. Rude and difficult to work with.”
HUMAN10
“Get ready to spend 5+ hours every week for one assignment.”
HUM10
“There were 10+ paragraph essays almost every week”
HUM10
“Easily 5 plus hours of .”
HUMANITIES10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize weekly papers and peer reviews more than formal exams, so and assignment-driven.

Paper HeavyPeer ReviewWeekly Writing

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or test format.

Group Projects
“It is not so much about dates and timelines, but .”
HIST17A

Online

Online , and long readings rather than proctored exams.

Weekly EssaysPeer ReviewsNo Outside Sources
“ ”
HUM10
“There are ”
HUMAN10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid if you cherish free time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews (16 online, 2 in , and format contrast. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Intensity

18/100

“Get ready to spend 5+ hours every week for one assignment.”

📝

22/100

“There were 10+ paragraph essays almost every week, and you will have to grade each other's work”

👎 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ !”

❤️ Older Positive View

80/100

“ and an extremely easy A. Do the work and have fun!”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very picky with and expectations
  • No chill for
  • as long as you do the work and show you know the material you will pass
  • and an extremely easy A

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • So much work every week for no reason
  • Easily 5 plus hours of
  • Loads to read each week
  • I atleast spent 9-10 hours for this class every week

Theme 3

💬 About Support & Tone

  • Never responded to emails and not kind
  • her message back to me was so heartfelt
  • so don't even bother

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews with strong consistency on workload and a some older positive outliers.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

HUM105 reviews
HUMAN104 reviews
PHIL202 reviews
C04211 review
D97021 review
Show 5 more courses
HIST17A1 review
HIST17B1 review
HUM111 review
HUMAN111 review
HUMANITIES101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2