AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Tuesday Benavidez-Knight

N22 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Prefer her in person for a manageable nursing course; be cautious online due to organization and leniency complaints.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Online vs In PersonCaring In PersonUnorganized OnlineQuiz FocusedLow Leniency Online
  • In-person students call her easy, caring, and
  • Online students report access issues, passive-aggressive responses, and
  • Experience depends heavily on format rather than a single consistent style

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

In person can feel easy with , but online access and .

; online reviews report drops and conflict.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ranges from very easy in person to stressful online, averaging a standard nursing load with required reading.

In person reads light; online feels harder due to access and process issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

One in-person review while another says it was, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About 75% would take again, but praise is mostly in person while online reviews are harsh.

; online experience is poor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

In as supportive and quick; online is called tough with no late leniency.

Format shift

Online is stricter and less flexible than in person.

Workload

Light

62/100

Positive reviews cite limited work and .

Format shift

In person feels light; online workload complaints center more on access than volume.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Caring and , but online students report disorganization and harsh communication.

Format shift

and negative online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes based on ATI reading and lecture answers drive the course more than large projects.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize quizzes and tests over heavy paper loads.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

teaching, and quiz support from lectures.

Main concern

Some lectures feel boring or a .

What students said

“it was a very easy course. Not a lot of work and she was quick to grade everything.”
N22
“She's an amazing professor who really helps you learn without making you feel dumb.”
N22

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online N22 reviews are strongly negative about access problems, zero late-work leniency, and unsupportive communication.

Main concern

Tech or access issues may be met with and no flexibility.

What students said

“Right away because I didn't have access to a laptop.”
N22
“she was very passive aggressive and of being able to turn in a assignment that she failed to let you have access to.”
N22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on quizzes from assigned ATI chapters, with lecture hints in person and less clarity online.

ATI-based quizzesLecture-supported quiz answersTest heavy (online)

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and she often gives quiz answers during lecture.

ATI chapter quizzesQuiz answers in lecture
“Make sure to read the ATI chapters she assigns, as . .”
N22

Online

Online comments emphasize tests and zero .

Test heavyNo late-work leniency
“Be ready to have no leniency for late work especially if the professor didn't give proper access to be able to even complete the work.”
N22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I actually took Professor Knight for Nurs51 and it was a very easy course. Not a lot of work and she was quick to grade everything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (2 online, 2 in person), highlighting a strong format split. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She's an amazing professor who really helps you learn without making you feel dumb.”

🖥️ Online Experience Risk

20/100

“Right away because I didn't have access to a laptop.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • it was a very easy course. Not a lot of work
  • really helps you learn without making you feel dumb
  • .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Online Issues

  • the .
  • no leniency for late work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only four recent reviews with a sharp online versus in-person split limit reliability of any single overall portrait.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

N224 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1