AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Martin Gutierrez

ACCT10 · ACCT10A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

come ready to participate and apply yourself, but expect and uneven lecture quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed reviewsParticipation mattersClear grading criteriaOrganizedDoes not respond to emails
  • some praise organization and help, others call lectures weak and non-responsive
  • Participation and
  • and not mandatory

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students report A/A-/B+ with moderate difficulty if they participate and apply themselves.

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty around 2-4 with straightforward content for those who engage, harder when lectures feel weak.

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; participation still matters.

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; strong praise and harsh criticism both exist.

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

; grades span A to B+ with participation mattering.

Format shift

Based on In person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Standard accounting load with textbooks and participation; not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Based on In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Organized and helpful for some; weak lectures, tech issues, and .

Format shift

Based on In person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Participation, class work, and ; .

Format shift

Based on In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

organized and and poor email response for others.

Main concern

Inconsistent lecture quality and .

What students said

“Dont like , and does not know how to work the program.”
ACCT10A
“ . Make sure you come to class ready to learn.”
ACCT10A
“His class is very straightforward and obviously, the other person that commented on here didn't apply themselves.”
ACCT10A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; as clear and participation-focused.

Clear grading criteriaParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students note and participation.

Clear grading criteriaParticipation matters
“His class is very straightforward and obviously, the other person that commented on here didn't apply themselves.”
ACCT10A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dont like , and does not know how to work the program.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 In person reviews, highlighting split teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Dont like , and does not know how to work the program.”

👍 Positive Experience

80/100

“Amazing class I learned so much!”

⚖️ Participation Focus

70/100

“Participation matters. Learned a lot from him and he is willing to help any way he can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great instructor
  • Dont like his lectures

Theme 2

📧 About Responsiveness

  • ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His class is very straightforward
  • Make sure you come to class ready to learn
  • Bad class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four In person reviews spanning 2016-2024 with mixed but detailed opinions and grades.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT10A3 reviews
ACCT101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values