AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Brian Condrey

HUMANS213 · ENG1A · ENGL1AM8375 · ENGL34 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Strong pick for English or humanities credit if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGreat FeedbackCaringClear ExpectationsHilarious LecturesExtra Credit
  • , and easy to contact with .
  • Workload is generally light to moderate with helpful and flexible support.
  • One strong negative review flags plagiarism accusations and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Most students report As with and flexible support, though one online review describes harsh treatment.

In-person comments lean easiest; the main grade friction appears in one online ENGL34 review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content and workload are widely described as light, with interesting readings and doable assignments.

In-person reviews emphasize easy participation; online film and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Some sections mark attendance optional or no mandatory Zoom, while as required.

Online film notes no mandatory Zoom; as yes.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Seven of as caring, funny, and supportive.

Recommendation is strong in both formats aside from one online complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students say he is not tough on grading, offers , and works with those who fall behind.

Format shift

Mostly consistent across .

Workload

Light

74/100

Work is usually doable with readings, films, and assignments rather than overwhelming volume.

Format shift

In-person often feels lightest; one .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and accessibility dominate the student narrative.

Format shift

Positive teaching praise is strong online and in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of assignments, readings, films, occasional tests, and .

Format shift

Online includes timed tests and film work; and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and easy, with little work beyond participation and interesting reading.

Main concern

There is still reading and note-taking expected in lecture-based sections.

What students said

“Great professor, little to no work needed, just participate”
HUMANS213
“Easy classes, fun readings, good to talk to whenever you need help with an assignment.”
ENG1A
“his lectures are very clear but it's well worth it”
HUMANS213

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students , and manageable film or English work, with one harsh outlier about test timing and plagiarism claims.

Main concern

One review reports unreasonably short online tests and a plagiarism accusation.

What students said

“Brian was one of the . and advice if you are struggling”
ENGL34
“ . Great professor”
HUMANS213
“assigned lots of homework, and set unreasonably short test times that made it impossible to finish”
ENGL34

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Most reviews focus on assignments and feedback; one online review reports very short timed tests.

Timed Online TestsClear Grading CriteriaExtra CreditAssignment Feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize lectures, notes, reading, and .

Lecture BasedReading HeavyLenient Grading
“his lectures are very clear but it's well worth it”
HUMANS213
“little to no work needed, just participate”
HUMANS213

Online

Online evidence includes clear assignment expectations plus one report of 100-question tests cut to 25 minutes.

Timed Online TestsExtra CreditClear Criteria
“set unreasonably short test times that made it impossible to finish, like reducing a 100-question test to just 25 minutes.”
ENGL34
“Lots of Opportunities. !”
ENGL34

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Condrey is literally the goat.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews across online and outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ so far. I had him for .”

📝

92/100

“ . Great professor”

⚠️ Outlier Concern

20/100

“The teacher accused me of plagiarizing, had terrible movie choices, assigned lots of homework, and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy classes
  • Lots of Opportunities
  • work he gives might seem like a lot at first but they aren't bad at all

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very caring and will work with you
  • Accessible outside class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews are mostly consistent and recent, but the small sample and one sharp outlier limit certainty.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL343 reviews
HUMANS2133 reviews
ENG1A1 review
ENGL1AM83751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values