AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dung Nguyen

STATS1 · STAT1 · MATH110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Solid for basic math or stats if you can handle the accent and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStrong AccentApproachableEasy GraderTest HeavyInconsistent Grading
  • Caring and starts from basics so weaker math students can follow
  • Strong accent is a recurring complaint and can hurt lecture clarity
  • , but one review reports unfair and inconsistent marking

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report , and grade bumps that make solid grades reachable without extreme effort.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is described as not hard, with the instructor starting from basics for students who forgot prior math.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

and others not required.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but praise for help and ease is undercut by accent and fairness complaints.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Several students call him an , though one report of inconsistent marking lowers trust.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

and light math or intro stats load; no widespread complaints of overwhelming work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students like his care and clarity when understood, but a strong accent and one very negative fairness review pull quality down.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Stats and math sections emphasize tests, with review days and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person math and and light content with accent friction and .

Main concern

Accent clarity and occasional unfair or .

What students said

“Hes very happy all the time and .”
MATH110
“ wrong on one persons test but the same answer was correct on another persons”
STATS1
“At the end whoever had 75% he bumped for B, 85% to A.”
STAT1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and curves, not especially open or closed-book heavy.

Exam Review DayPrevious Year Exam PracticeCurve BumpsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

using prior-year problems, with some curve bumps and fairness concerns.

Exam Review DayPrevious Year Exam PracticeCurve Bumps
“He just gave us copy of and did the problems in order.”
STAT1
“he marked one answer but the same answer was correct on another persons”
STATS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I really liked having him as my teacher. Its really not hard at all to understand his Asian accent and if it is he will repeat himself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2019, highlighting accent, approachability, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Hes very happy all the time and .”

⚖️

68/100

“Defiantly not a .”

📈 Easy Grades

78/100

“At the end whoever had 75% he bumped for B, 85% to A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He understands not everyone remembers math from years ago and starts at the bottom.
  • and gave us packets for homework so we didn't use the book at all.
  • He has a very deep accent which sometimes makes it harder to understand him.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • If you pay attention you can pass.
  • I didn't learn anything in his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

and one sharp outlier on fairness limit confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1102 reviews
STAT11 review
STATS11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values