AI Rate Professor

Political Science

David Rubiales

POLISCI1 · HISTORY · POLYSCI · HIST17 · HISTORY17AB · HISTORY17A · HIST · POLSC1 · POLITICALSCI · HISTHIST · HIST17APS1 · POLISC · HIST17B · HISTORY17 · HISTO17A · HIST17A · HIST17AB · NATAM7 · HIS17B · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle strong political framing and still work independently for the grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolitical BiasPolarizing LecturesStudy GuidesRude to DissentersOpinionated
  • Students split hard between insightful engaging lectures and rude opinionated classroom politics
  • Several reviewers say grades and treatment improve if you echo his views
  • and study guides when you stay engaged

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some say tests are manageable with study guides or by aligning with his views, while and harsh treatment.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard history and poli sci difficulty, with extra work and note-taking needed for success.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as and success is tied to coming to class and taking notes.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Positive lecture fans exist, but overall tone is heavily negative about rudeness and political pressure.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Multiple students claim political agreement affects treatment and grades, including one .

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Reading, notes, quizzes, and some extra work are common; not overwhelming for engaged students.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Lecture knowledge can be strong, but frequent reports of arrogance, mockery, and politicized teaching drag quality down.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes, tests, and study-guide-driven exams dominate comments more than projects.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Large polarized In person history and political science record: strong lectures and study guides for some, arrogance and political bias for many others.

Main concern

Frequent reports of belittling students and treating class as a political platform.

What students said

“His classes are insightful, the study guides) and his lectures are great.”
HISTO17A
“HORRIBLE TEACHER!!His History class is nothing more than a platform for him to shove his liberal political views down the throats of a captive audience.”
HISTHIST
“When you ask him for help or anything he talks down to you and shuts you down.”
HIST17A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, with moderate academic risk and little proctoring detail.

Study GuidesTests Similar to QuizzesLecture Heavy Prep

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides; reviews do not clearly prove lockdown or webcam proctoring.

Study GuidesQuiz-Based Tests
“the study guides)”
HISTO17A
“ .”
HIST17AB
“ .”
HIST17B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“HORRIBLE TEACHER!!His History class is nothing more than a platform for him to shove his liberal political views down the throats of a captive audience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 In person reviews, highlighting polarization on politics and teaching tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Every once in a while you run across a professor who is truly informed and cares about what they teach. Rubiales is that kind of professor.”

👎 Classroom Climate

25/100

“Rude and opinionated...he actually made fun of a student and her religion in class on time.”

📚

70/100

“the study guides)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His classes are insightful
  • Amazing lectures
  • teaches opinion as fact

Theme 2

⚖️ About Politics and Grades

  • shove his liberal political views down the throats of a captive audience
  • just regurgitate his liberal views, even if you don't believe it and you can get an A
  • He is very easy and if you follow his Political views

Theme 3

⚠️ About Character

  • cold hearted jerk
  • makes fun of students
  • Arrogant

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three In person reviews over many years show consistent polarization around politics, rudeness, and lecture quality.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

POLYSCI6 reviews
HIST17A4 reviews
POLISCI13 reviews
HIST17AB2 reviews
HIST17B2 reviews
Show 14 more courses
HISTHIST2 reviews
POLSC12 reviews
HIS17B1 review
HIST1 review
HIST171 review
HIST17APS11 review
HISTO17A1 review
HISTORY1 review
HISTORY171 review
HISTORY17A1 review
HISTORY17AB1 review
NATAM71 review
POLISC1 review
POLITICALSCI1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values