AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Susan Bowley

ENG10 · ENGR35 · ENGR10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Proceed with caution; outcomes seem highly dependent on section and student self-study ability.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingReads from the bookContradicts herselfDifficult homeworkMixed reviews
  • Reviews are sharply split between terrible and excellent experiences.
  • Some students say lectures contradict the book and each other.
  • yet useful for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades range from A to F and several students found the course painful, so an A is not easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings swing from easy to extreme, landing near average overall challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Comments report both mandatory and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

while others call the class terrible, so fit is highly personal.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

One student got an A while another got an F, with little detail on curving or harsh cutoffs.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Praise for clarity and inspiration is offset by complaints of reading the book and self-contradiction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Students mention and chapter-based tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and inspirational while others call lectures contradictory or terrible.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching quality and some very negative course experiences.

What students said

“She constantly contradicts herself throughout each lecture .”
ENG10
“Susan was an excellent professor. and provided great insight on every topic we discussed”
ENGR10
“Terrible Professor”
ENGR35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are not described as extreme; main advice is to know chapter concepts and .

Concept-based testsHomework helps exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if you understand main chapter concepts; .

Concept-based testsHomework helps exams
“The concepts of each chapter to pass the test.”
ENG10
“Hw probs are difficult and helped with exams”
ENGR35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She constantly contradicts herself throughout each lecture . The concepts of each chapter to pass the test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching quality and standard exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“She constantly contradicts herself throughout each lecture .”

⚠️ Polarized Experience

40/100

“Terrible Professor”

🌟 Positive Counterpoint

75/100

“Susan was an excellent professor. and provided great insight on every topic we discussed”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Reads out of the book during class
  • constantly contradicts herself
  • and provided great insight

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hw probs are difficult and helped with exams
  • I hate this class. :( HELP ME.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but polarized signal rather than a clean consensus.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGR353 reviews
ENG101 review
ENGR101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3