AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Diana Patterson

NURSING1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a tough but you a better nurse.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive Clinical MentorHard but Fair GraderPushes for Real SkillsSweet and Encouraging
  • Highly supportive clinical instructor who pushes students hard while .
  • Strict on clinical paperwork because she wants lasting nursing competence.
  • Only one detailed review, so confidence is limited but tone is strongly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A+ is possible, but she is a hard grader on clinical paperwork and .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Clinical work is moderately demanding; she pushes the group hard rather than treating it as an easy ride.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

The sole .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

88/100

The student calls her wonderful and credits her with giving tools for future nursing success.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Described as a while aiming for student success.

Format shift

Based solely on the one in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

She pushes the clinical group hard, so expect meaningful effort rather than light busywork.

Format shift

Based solely on the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students say she is sweet, wants them to succeed, and gives practical tools for nursing careers.

Format shift

Based solely on the one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Emphasis falls on clinical paperwork and applied clinical performance rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Based solely on the one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Students describe her as a sweet but demanding clinical instructor who pushes hard and grades paperwork strictly so nurses truly learn.

Main concern

Hard grading on clinical paperwork and on.

What students said

“although she pushed our group really hard, she was really sweet about it”
NURSING1
“She is a but she wants you to understand so you will succeed”
NURSING1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize clinical paperwork grading rather than formal proctored exams.

Clinical Paperwork Focus

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on clinical paperwork and instructor evaluation of clinical readiness.

Clinical Paperwork FocusHard Grading on Write-Ups
“She is a but she wants you to understand so you will succeed”
NURSING1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She wants her class to succeed and will give you the tools for your future success as nurses.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting clinical support and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She is wonderful!”

⚖️

38/100

“She is a but she wants you to understand so you will succeed”

💪 Push and Support

88/100

“although she pushed our group really hard, she was really sweet about it”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was really sweet about it
  • She wants her class to succeed
  • will give you the tools for your future success as nurses

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • pushed our group really hard

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the picture is detailed but not robust across time or courses.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURSING11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values