AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Robert Bringolf

LD7 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Looks promising from one glowing review, but go in with low detail on how the class actually runs.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly enjoyedCriminal JusticeAttendance mandatorySparse reviews
  • Only one student review exists and it is strongly positive
  • Student earned an A and wanted more classes with him
  • Almost

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

The only student earned an A at moderate difficulty, but .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is rated moderate with no comments about content being especially easy or brutal.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

The review form lists attendance as .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

The sole student strongly enjoyed the class and asked for more.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Student received an A and , but sample size is one.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

No workload details were provided beyond a moderate difficulty rating.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

The only review is enthusiastically positive with a perfect quality rating.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not describe whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person Criminal Justice student strongly enjoyed the class, earned an A, and wanted more.

Main concern

Almost no concrete detail beyond enjoyment and .

What students said

“I really enjoyed this guy's class. More!!!”
LD7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I really enjoyed this guy's class. More!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 short review, highlighting strong enjoyment with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“I really enjoyed this guy's class. More!!!”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“I really enjoyed this guy's class. More!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I really enjoyed this guy's class. More!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Single short 2015 review with almost no operational detail makes conclusions fragile.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LD71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values