AI Rate Professor

English

Larissa Juarez

ENGL1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate a harsh, unsupportive classroom climate.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude AttitudeEye RollingNo HelpAvoidClear But Harsh Rules
  • Students strongly warn about rude, stuck-up attitude and eye-rolling at questions.
  • Coursework itself is not the ; personality and lack of help are.
  • if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student said the work was fairly easy to get through, but no one describes an easy free A.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings are mixed, and comments focus more on attitude than on heavy academic challenge.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Every review strongly advises against taking her due to rude, unsupportive behavior.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students say there are , and little flexibility if you need help.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Work is described as fairly easy to complete, while lectures and interactions feel hostile.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students say teaching content is not the core failure; attitude, eye-rolling, and zero help destroy the experience.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize getting through the work and syllabus rules more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All in-person reviews attack attitude more than content difficulty, .

Main concern

Rude interactions, eye-rolling, and no real help when students ask questions.

What students said

“ . Rude, stuck up, and could care less about any of her students.”
4291
“She is as rude as they get. there are no chances with her.”
ENGL1A
“It wasnt that she was bad at teaching it was her attitude and personality”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews as open-book, proctoring, or closed-book policy.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting attitude and avoidance themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ . Rude, stuck up, and could care less about any of her students.”

😤 Classroom Attitude

15/100

“she roles her eyes at your questions. talks to you as if youre an idiot.”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“It was fairly easy getting through the work, just not the actual lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • There was no help given shed just reiterate herself.
  • , if you need help go back to syllabus.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Rude, stuck up
  • She is as rude as they get.
  • she was just horrible.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was fairly easy getting through the work
  • there are no chances with her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three same-month 2015 reviews, all negative and highly consistent on attitude but thin on grades and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1A2 reviews
42911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values