AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Donald Siggins

HUSEV33 · HUSEVADDI · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if and ; self-study may be safer than relying on his lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesGender Bias ComplaintsUnclear TestsTalks About HimselfUnfair Grading
  • Students describe lectures as scattered and self-focused rather than course-focused.
  • Multiple reviews allege harsher treatment and lower grades for male students.
  • on what is tested.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting a high grade seems hard if you are male, with reports of leniency toward women and C+ grades despite effort.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is mixed; the bigger issue is unclear expectations and .

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available reviews.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Students flag disorganization, rude remarks, and perceived gender bias, making him a poor choice for most.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

and little clarity on how work is evaluated.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Only two semester tests, but heavy memory load and expensive unused textbook still create stress.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Described as , and rude when responding to student answers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews portray a disorganized, off-topic lecturer with alleged gender bias and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He was ALL over the place. so ypu had to remember everything!”
HUSEV33
“if you are a guy you will get a C even if you do everything but if you are a girl you get an A just for bringing coffee”
HUSEVADDI

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, so students must memorize everything.

Few High-Stakes TestsUnclear Test ContentHeavy Memorization

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and students report poor guidance on what will appear.

Two Semester TestsUnclear Study Guide
“Only two tests the whole semester so ypu had to remember everything! .”
HUSEV33

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was ALL over the place. so ypu had to remember everything!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization and bias claims. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

30/100

“He was ALL over the place. so ypu had to remember everything!”

⚖️

28/100

“if you are a guy you will get a C even if you do everything but if you are a girl you get an A just for bringing coffee”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“Made rude remarks on everybodys answers.I did feel also he was very leniant with woman and not so much towards men.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was ALL over the place
  • He talked more about himself then the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so ypu had to remember everything
  • if you are a guy you will get a C even if you do everything
  • really doesn't like men at all feel unfair towards sexual preference

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews from 2012-2014 with limited detail and no recent corroboration.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUSEV331 review
HUSEVADDI1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values