AI Rate Professor

English

Francesca Hulin

ESL229 · ESL116B · ENGENG · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you meet deadlines and want writing help, but know some students felt degraded and unsupported.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring When PositiveStrict DeadlinesMixed RespectStrong Writing TipsPolarizing
  • , and writing help.
  • One strong negative review calls her rude, disrespectful, and unhelpful.
  • Overall experience swings hard by student, so expectations vary widely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Low difficulty ratings in positive reviews suggest a fair A is reachable with timely work, but she enforces deadlines strictly.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

ESL and English courses are described as well taught with helpful writing tips, though one review found it hard.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Two students call her the best and very helpful, while one strongly warns others away for rudeness.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; one B+ reported, with strict on-time expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Work is expected on time; not described as overwhelming but not featherlight either.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

65/100

and care, offset by one report of disrespectful treatment.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize writing tips and finishing work .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

instruction and a harsh report of rudeness and no help.

Main concern

Inconsistent student treatment and respect.

What students said

“SHE IS A GREAT TEACHER!! HULIN TEACHES VERY WELL AND CARES FOR THEIR STUDENTS AND GIVES US GOOD TIPS IN WRITING.”
ESL116B
“Professor is very rude and not willing to help the student. She treats her students with no respect”
ESL229

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus more on assignments and writing .

Timely AssignmentsWriting Focus

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; emphasis is on getting work done on time.

On-Time Work Expected
“She is strict in the way that want students to hav their job done on time as she does with hers.”
ENGENG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SHE IS A GREAT TEACHER!! HULIN TEACHES VERY WELL AND CARES FOR THEIR STUDENTS AND GIVES US GOOD TIPS IN WRITING.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, balancing strong praise against one harsh critique. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“SHE IS A GREAT TEACHER!! HULIN TEACHES VERY WELL AND CARES FOR THEIR STUDENTS AND GIVES US GOOD TIPS IN WRITING.”

❤️ Student Care

70/100

“Teacher Hulin is very helpful and cares for their undersatnding in class.”

⚠️ Respect Concerns

20/100

“She treats her students with no respect, she forgets she is there to teach not degrade students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • HULIN TEACHES VERY WELL AND CARES FOR THEIR STUDENTS
  • GIVES US GOOD TIPS IN WRITING
  • very helpful and cares for their undersatnding in class

Theme 2

⚠️ About Respect & Tone

  • Professor is very rude and not willing to help the student
  • treats her students with no respect
  • I would not recommend this professor, a waste of your time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three older reviews (2011-2014) show a but limited sample size.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGENG1 review
ESL116B1 review
ESL2291 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values