AI Rate Professor

Biology

Karen Mcreynolds

ECO10L · BIOL15 · ECOL10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will study hard and ; do not expect free grades.

Best fit · Effort For RewardApproachable personNot an easy ATests mismatch studyRequires real effortMixed teaching quality
  • She is often described as nice and approachable as a person.
  • Grades require real studying; students warn it is not an easy A.
  • One class had severe test mismatch and many failing scores.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Students stress it is not an easy A and that real studying and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Biology and and high fail rates make the course feel hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One review urges paying attention in class .

; no formal policy stated.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Some students respect her fairness while others say and dean intervention.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Not spoonfed; As require study, and one course had widespread failing tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

; success depends on doing the work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Approachable and sometimes fine, but one section called teaching horrendous with mismatched tests.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests dominate outcomes and were the main source of student frustration.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

approachable with fair effort required, versus severe test-content mismatch in one course.

Main concern

and some sections felt poorly taught.

What students said

“people should not expect to get an easy A, it's biology! I got an A and it required studying.”
BIOL15
“ , but she doesn't spoonfeed you.”
ECO10L
“The study. With over 100 students, less than half actually passed a test!”
ECOL10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and sometimes poorly aligned with what students were told to study.

Tests mismatch study materialHigh fail rate on testsIn-person tests

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, with many students failing.

Tests mismatch study materialHigh fail rate on tests
“The study. With over 100 students, less than half actually passed a test!”
ECOL10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The study. With over 100 students, less than half actually passed a test!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️

30/100

“The study.”

📚 Not an Easy A

35/100

“people should not expect to get an easy A, it's biology! I got an A and it required studying.”

🙂 Approachable but uneven

48/100

“Good professor! should not expect to get an easy A”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A and it required studying.
  • she doesn't spoonfeed you.
  • Do the assnmts + xtra credit... get an A.

Theme 2

🧪

  • her teaching was horrendous.
  • We had to speak to the dean to get them to do something so we could actually have a shot at passing.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Only three 2011 reviews with mixed detail; one detailed negative exam account lowers confidence in consistency.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIOL151 review
ECO10L1 review
ECOL101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values