AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jason Erbele

MATH50 · MATH227 · MATH104 · MATH55 · MATH132 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
21.43%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you are strong in , and can tolerate surprise quizzes and unclear structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPop quizzesHeavy homeworkConfusing lecturesSlow gradingTest heavy
  • Most students describe the class as very difficult and poorly structured.
  • , and unclear lectures are repeated complaints.
  • A few students say he is helpful if asked, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

A is rare because students describe hard quizzes, , and difficult tests.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The math content becomes harder because , and often require students to teach themselves.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, but students say missing class makes it very hard to pass.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and exams are very difficult.

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report strict credit rules, hard quizzes, few graded items, and difficult tests, despite a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework, surprise quizzes, jam-packed lectures, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Most reviews describe unclear , and self-teaching, with only a few students praising his help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Grades , and few major graded items, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative and , and delayed grading.

Main concern

The main concern is that students must self-teach while , and .

What students said

“Do yourself a favor and .”
MATH227
“no structure, no direction.”
MATH132
“ but might as well be.”
MATH50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are generally described as difficult and strict, though some reviews .

Pop QuizzesHard TestsLimited Time TestsIndex Cards Sometimes AllowedTest Corrections Sometimes Allowed

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, limited test time, and inconsistent note-card allowances.

Pop QuizzesHard TestsLimited Time TestsIndex Cards Sometimes AllowedTest Corrections Sometimes Allowed
“He allowed notecards and but it was still too difficult.”
MATH50
“ concepts introduced.”
MATH132
“there are limited amount of time he gives for tests.”
MATH132

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“no structure, no direction.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

20/100

“ .”

🧪

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible explanations with problems going over and .
  • U gotta teach urself.
  • He explained things in a way I would understand, pushed me to be better and never gave up on me.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests And Quizzes

  • .
  • , and there are limited amount of time he gives for tests.
  • Exams were so difficult 2 prepare 4.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Structure

  • He will assign hours worth of .
  • Half his class dropped him in a week.
  • The book isn't required, and , so no need to buy MyMathLab.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 14 reviews over multiple years with , and unclear teaching.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH1325 reviews
MATH2274 reviews
MATH503 reviews
MATH1041 review
MATH551 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2