AI Rate Professor

Art History

Lewis Goldstein

ART1 · CERAMICSART18A · ARTS1 · ARTS280138 · ARTART · ARTS2 · ART2 · ART18A · AA · ART · ART10 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
96.77%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a supportive art professor with , and a very realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring and responsiveEasy A with effortClear grading criteriaExtra creditGreat lectures
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Goldstein as , and highly recommendable.
  • Getting an A is usually easy if students .
  • Online sections can have a lot of weekly work, while and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Most students report A or A+ grades because , and effort is rewarded generously.

Online evidence shows easy A results with quizzes and papers, while easily by trying.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

83/100

The material is usually described as easy and clear, though pressure.

Online courses can feel busier because of weekly modules, while as easier and more hands-on.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

in-person class, while online courses offer pacing, late work, and makeup flexibility.

Online reviews show flexible pacing and late work, while in-person reviews mention participation and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students repeatedly recommend him because , and makes success very attainable.

Both formats are strongly recommended, with online praise focused on flexibility and and classroom support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

93/100

Students often mention , late work acceptance, , makeup chances, and easy A outcomes.

Format shift

and late work, while in-person grading is described as lenient and effort based.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Most work is easy, but online sections can include lots of , and papers each week.

Format shift

Online workload varies from light to intense, while as manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Reviews consistently describe him as , and genuinely helpful.

Format shift

Online students emphasize fast replies and , while in-person students emphasize encouragement and hands-on help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear driven , and some quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, and papers, while , and studio projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as encouraging, lenient, and easy to pass when students participate and finish assignments.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter in some studio or discussion-based classes.

What students said

“Easy, Easy, Seriously, if you don't pass, you just don't want to.”
ART2
“ .”
CERAMICSART18A
“Lewis Goldstein is a very caring lenient teacher and one of the .”
ART1

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are extremely positive overall, with , and flexible late or .

Main concern

Some online , and papers, especially in shorter terms.

What students said

“Workload is not heavy at all; his lectures are great; easy as well.”
ART1
“The course load is extreme, he assigns on average 5-7 assignments per week outside of a quiz and .”
ART1
“He offers almost every week.”
ARTS2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but student-friendly, with comments supporting , makeup tests, and paper-based finals instead of strict proctored exams.

Quiz RetakesPaper-Based FinalMake-Up Test AllowedNo Final Besides Papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and discussions, but they do not clearly prove a .

Research Paper FinalProject-Based WorkDiscussion-Based Class
“There's a 6-page research paper for the .”
ART2
“Class is mainly discussions.”
ART2
“Students were required to make three vases (various sizes), three cups, (different types), and a box with a lid.”
ART18A

Online

, and final papers, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Quiz RetakesMake-Up Test AllowedPaper-Based FinalNo Final Besides Papers
“You are able to retake the .”
ARTS2
“There is no final besides two papers throughout the 9 weeks.”
ARTS2
“will let you make up a test.”
ARTS280138

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Goldstein was by far the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“Professor Goldstein is a fantastic teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ and everyone.”

📈 Easy A Potential

94/100

“Easy A and .”

⚖️

93/100

“he accepts late & missing work all throughout the semester, so its impossible to fail his class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are great;
  • The professor is very understanding and helpful.
  • Very good teacher, always helpful and encouraging.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A with professor Goldstein!
  • If you do the work you'll pass.
  • grades are super simple and gives too.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • Lots of reading, but not overwhelming.
  • The course load is extreme, he assigns on average 5-7 assignments per week outside of a quiz and .
  • The but easy.

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • He is genuinely a nice person and will help you any way he can.
  • He is willing to work with you.
  • I wish more teachers were like him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 42 reviews span many years, both formats are well represented, and the positive pattern is very consistent.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART115 reviews
ARTS17 reviews
ART25 reviews
ARTS24 reviews
CERAMICSART18A4 reviews
Show 6 more courses
art102 reviews
AA1 review
ART1 review
ART18A1 review
ARTART1 review
ARTS2801381 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 13 · A 12

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1