AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Jerry Jacobs

SOCI25 · PSYC33 · SOC1 · SOC2 · SOCI1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can handle strict writing standards, slow communication, and a demanding tone.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSlow responsesResearch papersRude toneClear grading criteria
  • Students repeatedly describe strict .
  • Online reviews are split, with some strong praise for feedback but more concern about slow or rude communication.
  • In-person reviews are older and , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Passing can be manageable with effort, but and .

Online reviews include one easy-pass comment but more strict-grading complaints, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Intro course content may be manageable, but the writing expectations and debate style raise the difficulty.

, while in-person evidence emphasizes demanding research papers and difficult classroom tone.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, though one in-person review says participation matters.

Online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most students warn against taking him because of , and rude communication.

Online reviews are mixed but lean negative, while and mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Multiple students call him a tough or .

Format shift

Both formats mention strict grading, with online reviews adding grade-correction issues and .

Workload

Heavy

33/100

The workload is , and writing-heavy expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews mention five-to-ten-page papers, while as unusually demanding.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

A few students praise his feedback or teaching, but many describe him as .

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest split, while and mostly criticize his tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Comments , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers plus a midterm or test questions, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative and older, , and demanding papers.

Main concern

Students may struggle with his tone and paper expectations.

What students said

“I think he is an awesome teacher”
PSYC33
“WORST. Rude, condescending, passive aggressive.”
PSYC33
“Wasn't a ”
SOCI1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are polarized, with praise for feedback in one class but , and slow replies.

Main concern

Slow communication and .

What students said

“ as the instructor again.”
SOCI25
“The Professor is very involved in the online discussions, and .”
SOC2
“It is very easy to pass if you give a little effort.”
SOC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and test questions but do not clearly prove book policy, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Midterm MentionedTest Questions Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Online

Online reviews mention a midterm and test questions, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Midterm MentionedTest Questions Mentioned
“He did give me points back on the though”
SOC1
“ ”
SOCI25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as the instructor again.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“The Professor is very involved in the online discussions, and .”

⚖️

24/100

“He is a ; .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

34/100

“Not terrible, but I'd research other professors before choosing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I think he is an awesome teacher
  • WORST. Rude, condescending, passive aggressive.
  • .

Theme 2

📄

  • Had you writing a 10-page research paper like it was an Ivy League school.
  • He gives two 5 page essays which he grades very strictly!
  • he assigns a .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Difficulty

  • It is very easy to pass if you give a little effort.
  • Multiple test questions were graded incorrectly, and and ask him to change our grades.
  • Wasn't a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews span many years and and tone concerns, but several are old and some are vague.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

SOC13 reviews
PSYC332 reviews
SOCI12 reviews
SOC21 review
SOCI251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values