AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Brittany Davis

40359PSYC2 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared to work independently with and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard GraderUnclear AssignmentsPoor CommunicationHeavy HomeworkLow Helpfulness
  • and poor support across both formats.
  • , and uncorrected tests.
  • Grades reported are weak, with no .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Reported grades include D-, F, and B+, with repeated hard-grader signals and .

and , while the in-person review also reports failing and no help.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course appears challenging because students mention , and .

Online reviews and homework, while the in-person review only confirms a poor experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly mention .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students report , and no meaningful support.

Both formats are negative, with online reviews giving more specific reasons and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Multiple reviews label her a , and the reported grades are D-, F, and B+.

Format shift

, and the in-person review also includes a failing grade.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

, and many papers, with no evidence of a light workload.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and reading, while the .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students , and limited professor interaction.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on weak communication and feedback, while the all.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework, assignments, and tests, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says the professor was not helpful.

Main concern

There is too little support for students who need guidance.

What students said

“ ”
40359PSYC2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews report hard grading, heavy reading or , and weak test feedback.

Main concern

Students may struggle to get timely help or .

What students said

“ ”
40359PSYC2
“The .”
40359PSYC2
“Hard to get a hold of, .”
40359PSYC2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book requirements.

Tests MentionedPoor Test FeedbackExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Online

Online reviews mention tests not being corrected, but they do not clearly prove the .

Tests Not CorrectedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“The so you will never know the right answer.”
40359PSYC2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard to get a hold of, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and feedback. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ ”

⚖️

8/100

“ ”

📩 Communication

15/100

“Hard to get a hold of, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • I wish there was more interaction between the professor and the students.
  • Hard to get a hold of, .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .

Theme 3

📝

  • The so you will never know the right answer.
  • How are you supposed to improve if you don't know the correct answers?

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited by only three reviews, but the negative themes are consistent across formats and years.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

40359PSYC23 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values