AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Deborah Faulkenberry

SOCI140 · SOCI14 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a , and a manageable sociology or psychology course.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and responsiveClear grading criteriaQuick detailed feedbackLight workloadInteresting class structure
  • Students consistently describe her as , and willing to help.
  • Grades are usually strong, but weekly online participation and written work still matter.
  • The course is seen as interesting and manageable, with one concern about strict handling of plagiarism suspicion.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Most students earned A-range grades and describe the workload as manageable, though online weekly participation and .

Online evidence shows regular weekly work with strong grades, while the and an easy Gen Ed.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students describe the course as not hard, interesting, and useful, with beginner-friendly support from the professor.

Online reviews call the class interesting and not hard, while the as an easy Gen Ed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Reviews do not clearly prove strict attendance rules, but .

Online reviews mention weekly discussions and participation, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and makes the course feel worthwhile.

Both formats are positive, with online reviews stressing support and feedback and the so far.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades are usually high and criteria are clear, but one and plagiarism concerns.

Format shift

Online grading is mostly seen as fair and clear with one negative exception, while the .

Workload

Light

84/100

Work is usually described as weekly but manageable, and the in-person class is described as having very little work.

Format shift

, and chapter questions, while the in-person review reports very little work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and genuinely invested in their learning.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize feedback and accessibility, while the and an engaging class.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Assessment appears to mix , and a presentation rather than relying on only one format.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly discussions, quizzes, and chapter questions, while the , and a presentation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The and describes the class as , and easy for general education.

Main concern

Evidence .

What students said

“There's very little work.”
SOCI140
“Easy Gen Ed and great prof”
SOCI140

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are strongly positive, , and manageable weekly work.

Main concern

One student reported being repeatedly suspected of plagiarism in discussion posts.

What students said

“ and respectful.”
SOCI14
“ and grades quickly.”
SOCI14
“She suspected that I plagiarized.”
SOCI14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention online quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Weekly QuizzesTwo In-Person ExamsExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , but it does not clearly prove whether they are closed-book, open-book, proctored, or strict.

Two ExamsExam policy not clearly proven
“The course has and a little presentation.”
SOCI140

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention weekly quizzes, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Weekly QuizzesExam policy not clearly proven
“ and chapter questions.”
SOCI14

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Faulk has genuinely been the so far.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“She is such a great and kind teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

91/100

“ .”

⚖️

78/100

“She is very fair as long as you talk with her and out of her way to help and fix the problem and she does it quickly .”

📚 Workload

84/100

“There's very little work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and respectful.
  • and grades quickly.
  • I know she cares about her students and has a passion for teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class is not hard, and it is very interesting.
  • Easy Gen Ed and great prof
  • I got an A or A+

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments and Assessments

  • and chapter questions.
  • The course has and a little presentation.
  • She said I did not provide comments, only information, and suspected that I plagiarized again.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across 2019 to 2025 are mostly detailed and consistent, though .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOCI146 reviews
SOCI1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1