AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Jacob Lenerville

POLI2 · POLI3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

He may work for students who like lecture-based online classes with regular participation tasks, but the evidence is too limited for a strong recommendation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyParticipation MattersMixed Online ExperienceDiscussion Focused
  • , and they sharply disagree on teaching quality.
  • Both reviewers earned A grades, suggesting the course is manageable with participation.
  • The online course relies on lectures, discussion posts, and exit-ticket style written responses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Both reviewers reported A grades, but , and lecture responses still require steady effort.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content does not sound unusually hard, but the , and written engagement.

All course difficulty evidence comes from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation appears important because , and attendance-style expectations.

Online reviews show participation matters, and there is no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because one student strongly disliked the online format while .

Only online reviews exist, and they directly conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Both reported grades are A, but reviews do not provide enough grading detail to call it very generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload appears moderate because students mention lots of , and discussion posts.

Format shift

Online reviews suggest regular participation work, with no in-person comparison.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is uncertain because one review calls the lectures interesting and another says the professor talks too much.

Format shift

Only online reviews exist, and they are evenly split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and participation than major exams.

Format shift

Online comments mention participation tasks, and there is no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between one student who found him annoying and lecture-heavy and one who found the lectures interesting and .

Main concern

The main concern is whether students tolerate frequent lecture material and participation tasks.

What students said

“Very annoying professor, I took this class as it is an online independent study.”
POLI3
“His lectures are very interesting, he makes them interesting.”
POLI2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His lectures are very interesting, he makes them interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting split views on online lectures and participation; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“His lectures are very interesting, he makes them interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

📌 Participation Load

30/100

“ and they do matter.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very annoying professor, I took this class as it is an online independent study.
  • His lectures are very interesting, he makes them interesting.

Theme 2

📝 About Participation

  • I like the lecture exit tickets he uses where you have to write things you learned from the lecture, questions you have about the lectures.
  • and they do matter.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only two online reviews exist and they conflict strongly.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLI21 review
POLI31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values