AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Tanja Addison

PSYC1 · BIO11 · PSYC12 · PSYC1240662 · PSY12 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can follow directions closely and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderReading HeavyParticipation MattersMixed Teaching QualityLimited Extra Credit
  • Experiences are sharply mixed, with some students praising knowledge and feedback while others report poor communication.
  • Getting an A is possible, but students repeatedly mention strict grading, exact directions, and no .
  • Course , and participation rather than easy lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students must meet directions exactly, submit on time, and accept strict or .

Online evidence shows both successful A grades and , while and required participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

60/100

The content is mostly reading and discussion based, but poor structure and material itself.

and discussion, while in-person reviews range from simple paragraph work to unsupported weekly tasks.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation appears important, and one in-person tag directly warns that skipping class means you will not pass.

Online reviews emphasize participation in discussions, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format and student fit because reviews split between helpful expertise and and support.

Online and communication complaints in the in-person-labeled set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly describe tough grading, unclear standards, no late work, and no .

Format shift

Online reviews include the clearest grading complaints, while and no .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and some exams, with effort required but not consistently described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly discussions and article reading, while , and a midterm/final structure.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise her knowledge and discussions, but multiple reviews describe weak teaching support and poor communication.

Format shift

Online reviews are split between knowledgeable feedback and ignored grading questions, while and harsh complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and at least some midterm and .

Format shift

Online reviews mainly mention discussions and grading criteria, while in-person evidence explicitly and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

comments but also strong complaints about lack of teaching support.

Main concern

Some students say the class lacks useful lectures and timely help.

What students said

“ .”
PSY12
“Great teacher. We read the book in class and discussed it.”
BIO11

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews range from knowledgeable and fair to ignored questions and .

Main concern

Strict or .

What students said

“She is a bit of a , but never gives outrageously low scores.”
PSYC1
“Hard work is inconsequential, luck is REQUIRED.”
PSYC1240662

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final, but they do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book rules.

Midterm And Final MentionedTest Heavy MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final but do not clearly prove exam rules or .

Midterm And Final MentionedTest Heavy Mentioned
“200 points for weekly discussion, 200 points for midterm and final.”
PSY12

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a bit of a , but never gives outrageously low scores.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“ and/or unpresesnt guidelines.”

👍 Recommendation Level

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Addison really enjoyed and respected psychology.
  • .
  • Great teacher. We read the book in class and discussed it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • ALWAYS meet the word count, turn in , and !
  • .
  • Hard work is inconsequential, luck is REQUIRED.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • This is a research class so expect to read a lot of articles.
  • .
  • One journal per chapter only a paragraph long.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years give useful but inconsistent evidence, with some comments detailed and others very brief.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYC12 reviews
PSYC122 reviews
BIO111 review
PSY121 review
PSYC12406621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1