AI Rate Professor

History

Joseph Radzikowski

POLI3 · ENG50 · HIST2B · 2A · HIST2018 · HISTORY1A · HIST2A · HIST1A · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if and writing for a fair, supportive history course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackClear expectationsReading heavyEssay basedSupportive
  • , and supportive tone.
  • Getting a strong grade is realistic if students keep up with , and detailed writing.
  • , and finals rather than quick objective tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable because and clear, but students , and detailed papers.

Online evidence emphasizes long essays and discussions, while in person evidence , and syllabus clarity.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The content is accessible for many students, but the and .

Online reviews describe easy structure with writing-heavy work, while in person reviews are positive but less consistent about format.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Reviews , but participation and .

Online evidence focuses on deadlines and discussions, while in person evidence does not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Students usually recommend him because , and supportive.

Both formats are positive overall, but online reviews include more warnings about workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students report , and several A or A+ outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest evidence of , while in person reviews mainly describe fairness.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is manageable but , and long essay exams.

Format shift

Online reviews describe heavier writing demands, while in but with less detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Most students describe him as , and encouraging.

Format shift

and encouragement, while in person reviews are mostly positive with one serious responsiveness complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades appear , and written exams.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly describe written assignments and essay exams, while in and notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person-labeled reviews are very positive overall, though several comments describe online-style experiences and one reports poor responsiveness.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent responsiveness and .

What students said

“ .”
HIST1A
“A great professor! He follows everything on his syllabus, so there are no surprises!”
HIST2B

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive but , and .

Main concern

The main concern is the amount of reading and .

What students said

“An exam that consists of 8-10pgs after every four chapters (every other week).”
HIST2A
“Great professor. Allows 2 late .”
ENG50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mostly writing based, with some student-friendly notes but and .

Essay ExamsMidterm PapersFinal PapersNotes AllowedProctored Final

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews support notes for and a proctored final in one comment, but do not clearly prove a .

Notes AllowedProctored Final
“Final is a bit tough but you have!”
HIST2B
“There is , and a .”
HIST1A

Online

Online reviews support essay-style exams and paper-based midterms and finals, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Essay ExamsMidterm PapersFinal Papers
“it was a 10 page essay.”
HIST2A
“Midterm and answer from a list of questions he gives you.”
HIST1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Wonderful teacher, really knows his stuff.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Teacher is very polite and helpful, if you are going to take a !”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“Very easy A”

📝 Workload Reality

52/100

“ and they have to be a paragraph long.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I couldn't have asked for a better professor for my history course!
  • He was very encouraging.
  • Mr. and a great teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Course work was just a lot of reading and term and final.
  • There is alot of , and in 9 weeks.
  • The Research paper consist of 10 pages and I got an A on it!!

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • He follows everything on his syllabus, so there are no surprises!
  • Teacher is very fair, and I enjoyed the class.
  • He is very clear in what he requires and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years give consistent evidence , and writing demands.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST1A6 reviews
HIST2A3 reviews
HIST2B2 reviews
HISTORY1A2 reviews
2A1 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG501 review
HIST20181 review
POLI31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values