AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Andrew Rehfeld

PHIL4 · HUMA5 · HUMA1 · PHIL1 · PHIL3 · PHIL1C · HUMA2 · RLGS10 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a strong learning experience and are willing to engage seriously with the material.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent lecturerCritical feedbackFair but demandingCaringParticipation matters
  • Students strongly praise his teaching, communication, and ability to make philosophy engaging.
  • The course rewards effort, reading, participation, and thoughtful writing rather than shortcuts.
  • Some students warn that and expectations are critical.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Good grades are common, but students , and detailed responses.

, while in person reviews show strong teaching but some hard tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

He makes philosophy understandable, but , and critical evaluation keep the content moderately challenging.

In person lectures appear easier to follow, while online reviews mention more dense information and self-paced effort.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

as strictly mandatory, but participation and class presence strongly affect success.

In person reviews stress attending lectures for , while online reviews stress weekly participation and modules.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because , and intellectually rewarding.

, though online has more warnings about workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Students describe clear criteria and fairness, but several also call him a tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews contain more tough-grader warnings, while in person reviews are mixed between fair, , and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is structured and manageable for many students, but , and written responses require steady effort.

Format shift

Online reviews describe recurring weekly work, while in person reviews , and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and strong at explaining difficult ideas.

Format shift

In person reviews especially praise lectures and discussion, while online reviews praise responsiveness and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and finals.

Format shift

Online reviews mention modules with discussions, quizzes, and assignments, while in and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews praise his lectures, discussions, and help, though a and .

Main concern

The and limited note use in some classes.

What students said

“Its not an easy class but I got a lot out of it.”
PHIL1
“Hard class. Doesn't let you use notes or book for tests. .”
RLGS10

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are highly positive overall, but , and critical grading.

Main concern

The main concern is that online work can feel demanding and .

What students said

“If you are looking to slide through the path of least resistance in college, then you may find a better philosophy professor elsewhere.”
PHIL4
“ and simple.”
PHIL1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy varies by course, with some open-book quizzes but .

Open Book QuizzesTests Require StudyNo Notes Or Book In One ClassFinal Preparation

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews explicitly support open-book/open-note quizzes in one course and no notes or book for tests in another, so the policy varies.

Open Book QuizzesNo Notes Or Book In One ClassFinal Preparation
“ .”
HUMA5
“Doesn't let you use notes or book for tests.”
RLGS10

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and study needs, but do not clearly .

QuizzesTests Require Study
“1 Discussion and 1 quiz for each module.”
HUMA1
“Participate in the lectures and study for test.”
PHIL4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Its not an easy class but I got a lot out of it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He takes a lot of and to evaluate your responses critically.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“I would definitely recommend Rehfeld for Humanities 1.”

⚖️

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr Rehfield makes the class easy and fun and .
  • and fun.
  • He makes lectures relate-able and fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Logic is hard but .
  • He will be VERY critical of your work, so be prepared.
  • Hard class. Doesn't let you use notes or book for tests. .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Very caring and sends reminders throughout the so you can improve.
  • and .
  • He tries hard to get students to understand and gives lots of extra help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one detailed reviews across formats and years give strong, consistent evidence with some useful dissenting experiences.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL18 reviews
PHIL43 reviews
HUMA52 reviews
PHIL1C2 reviews
PHIL32 reviews
Show 3 more courses
RLGS102 reviews
HUMA11 review
HUMA21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 6 · A- 4

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values