AI Rate Professor

Education

Deborah Harris

CHLD9 · CHLD35 · PSYC4 · CHLD10 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are comfortable with heavy writing, strict rubrics, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy weekly workloadStrict writing standardsResponsive but demandingInconsistent teaching quality
  • Many students describe Harris as an .
  • The workload is heavy, with , and assignments.
  • Some students praise her clarity and responsiveness, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Students can earn A grades, but comments repeatedly say they must work hard and .

Online reviews are harsher and more frustrated, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course material is not always described as conceptually hard, but the reading and writing demands make it feel difficult.

Online students focus more on workload and , while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Participation matters in several reviews, but the comments do .

Online reviews mention discussion participation more often, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

because and heavy workload overshadow responsiveness and clarity.

Online recommendations are mostly negative, while but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Many students report , and rubric details even after strong effort.

Format shift

and in-person reviews, with the strongest complaints online.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly , and writing work.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the heaviest weekly load, while and homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students find her clear and responsive, but many describe , and frustrating grading communication.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are sharply divided and often negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears dominated , and some quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize writing assignments and discussions, while and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some praise for clarity and learning but and lots of reading.

Main concern

The main in-person and rubrics.

What students said

“ . Would get up to 25% knocked off for simple things like commas, or grammatical errors.”
CHLD9
“Professor Harris is definitely a tough grader but she and .”
CHLD9
“Weekly quizzes and grades corrected.”
20369

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing , and frustration with writing expectations.

Main concern

The main and citation issues.

What students said

“The work load is very heavy, and she's a .”
CHLD9
“She's also a . .”
CHLD35
“She gives a lot of work every week but they are not hard to do. .”
PSYC4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Essay-Like QuizzesWeekly QuizzesFinal MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final with mistakes, but do not clearly prove the .

Weekly QuizzesFinal Mentioned
“Weekly quizzes and grades corrected.”
20369

Online

Online reviews mention essay-like quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policies.

Essay-Like QuizzesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring
“ .”
CHLD9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I honestly tried really hard in this class. Literally followed the participated in discussions, and I never received full points.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

14/100

“ . Would get up to 25% knocked off for simple things like commas, or grammatical errors.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“The work load is very heavy, and she's a .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She is very thorough in her explanations and .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • .
  • She grade horrible strict.
  • . She's hard to please for sure.
  • You will need to work for the grade you want.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • While there is a heavy weekly workload with readings and comes in handy.
  • She provides a lot of information so be prepared to read a lot.
  • She gives a lot of work every week but they are not hard to do.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . Quick responses.
  • Professor Harris is definitely a tough grader but she and .
  • Her written lectures for the online class were awful. They were incomprehensible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across many years and both formats show a consistent pattern of and heavy workload.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHLD97 reviews
CHLD353 reviews
CHLD102 reviews
203691 review
PSYC41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1