AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Pamela Shane

CHLD4 · PSYC4 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can handle poor communication, heavy online work, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationHard GraderHeavy WorkloadConfusing DiscussionsLow Recommendation
  • Students repeatedly criticize communication delays and lack of instructor presence.
  • , and hard grading.
  • All four reviews are online and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even with one reported A, , and heavy work, so the A is costly.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels difficult because , and guidance is weak.

Only online reviews exist, and they consistently describe the course as challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation matters appears repeatedly, suggesting low flexibility even though .

Online reviews point to participation requirements, with no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because students , and excessive expectations.

All four online reviewers .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Multiple reviews call her a hard or .

Format shift

because there are no in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students describe lots of , and demanding assignments with short timelines.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently show heavy workload, with no in-person comparison.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students describe , and little instructor support.

Format shift

All teaching quality evidence comes from online classes and is consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize discussions, journals, papers, major assignments, and observation work more than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mainly describe assignment-heavy grading, with no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative, citing , and .

Main concern

Students feel unsupported and .

What students said

“Almost felt like I was taking a class without a teacher.”
CHLD4
“She grades hard on everything that the class does.”
PSYC4
“Very nit picky, and a .”
PSYC4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention vague study guidance but do not .

Unclear Exam PolicyVague Study Guidance

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention vague study guidance but do not .

Vague Study GuidanceUnclear Exam Policy
“she would give a study guide, but instead provided really vague instructions”
CHLD4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Almost felt like I was taking a class without a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Almost felt like I was taking a class without a teacher.”

⚖️

10/100

“Very nit picky, and a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“She expects far too much for the class that I'm in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is horrible at communication.
  • Almost felt like I was taking a class without a teacher.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She grades hard on everything that the class does.
  • Very nit picky, and a .
  • wrong with your work.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • Lots of homework
  • she expects far too much for the class that I'm in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four reviews across two courses are consistent, though they are older and all online.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHLD42 reviews
PSYC42 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values