AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cirilo Nevarez

MATH3 · MATH101 · CRN20336 · MAT095 · MATH50 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and rewards steady attendance.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesCaring and helpfulParticipation mattersClear expectationsMostly easy grading
  • Most students describe him as , and strong at explaining math.
  • Participation and , so skipping class can hurt performance.
  • One negative review reports frustration and poor professionalism, but most reviews are highly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students suggest passing is very realistic with attendance, though participation and staying present still matter.

All evidence comes from In person reviews, with no Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Math content , and repeated checks for understanding.

All course-easiness evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple reviews say participation matters, and one says you likely will not pass if .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students strongly recommend him because , and .

Recommendation evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

One student directly calls him an , and the overall difficulty ratings are low.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Reviews focus more on participation and .

Format shift

Workload evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students , and caring attitude despite one serious negative review.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews emphasize participation, lectures, and learning support, but .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are strongly positive, , and understandable math explanations.

Main concern

Participation and , and one student found him argumentative.

What students said

“He was very patient with those who haven't seen basic material in a while but did not linger too much on review.”
MAT095
“Makes sure you understand the lecture.”
MATH101
“Hes a as long as you attend.”
MATH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is an amazing professor that cares for his students and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 , and one dissenting concern. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is an amazing professor that cares for his students and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Accessibility

78/100

“Hes a as long as you attend.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes sure you understand the lecture.
  • He teaches in a easy way to understand, math class participation is a big deal because you can get behind if you miss classes.
  • He helps students learn and understand criteria needed.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • Always willing to help me out and .
  • He was very patient with those who haven't seen basic material in a while but did not linger too much on review.
  • He is accessible outside of class through email and , so no surprises.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • This professor is argumentative instead of listening, and allowing students to express themselves.
  • Hes easily frustrated, and at time lacks professionalism.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 9 reviews across a short time span show strong consistency with .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1015 reviews
CRN203361 review
MAT0951 review
MATH31 review
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1