AI Rate Professor

English

Lisa Mellado

ENG1A · ENGL20692 · ENGL1A · ENGL1C · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Lisa Mellado is a strong choice if and fair rewards but and essay work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear FeedbackExtra CreditFair but Essay-StrictCaringLots of Reading
  • because she is caring, fair, and .
  • Online students often describe the class as easy if instructions are followed, with available.
  • Some students warn that essays, reading, and workload can be demanding, especially for weaker writers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earn high grades with clear instructions and , but if writing quality is weak.

Online reviews more directly call the class easy, while and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The work is often described as not hard, but , and .

Online comments emphasize easy structure, while , and writing volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance rules are not clearly stated, but participation and .

, while online reviews do not clearly describe attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her for , and .

Both formats are strongly positive, with one online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grading is often called fair and supported by , but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention fair grading and , while and writing demands.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The work is manageable but , and some heavy homework reports.

Format shift

Online workload is usually manageable except for essay-heavy concerns, while and participation-based.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly praise her feedback, caring attitude, fast communication, passion, and class discussions.

Format shift

Online students emphasize responsiveness and feedback, while in-person students emphasize personality, involvement, and discussion.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and reading, with limited test evidence.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on assignments and essays, while , and one tricky test.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person , and feedback, while noting lots of work and participation.

Main concern

There is a lot of reading, writing, and participation even when the work is not hard.

What students said

“Very passionate, great personality, and very involved with students.”
ENG1A
“None of the work is hard, but there is a lot of it so you just need to be proficient with time management and not procrastinate.”
ENGL1A
“ .”
ENGL20692

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly very positive, , and clear instructions.

Main concern

if writing is weak or instructions are not followed closely.

What students said

“ . Gives . Answers emails fast and it's nice.”
ENG1A
“ , and .”
ENGL1A
“she grades ”
ENGL1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

mentioning a tricky test and an 8-10 page argumentative essay final.

Tricky Test MentionedArgumentative Essay FinalExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence mentions a tricky test and an 8-10 page argumentative essay final, but .

Tricky TestArgumentative Essay Final
“ , because she wants us to read the fine print that's easily overlooked.”
ENG1A
“Final was 8-10 page argumentative essay.”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's very fair, easy, as long as you follow the instructions you'll get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Very passionate, great personality, and very involved with students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“10/10 would be taught again”

⚖️

68/100

“ , and .”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“None of the work is hard, but there is a lot of it so you just need to be proficient with time management and not procrastinate.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Very passionate, great personality, and very involved with students.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She's very fair, easy, as long as you follow the instructions you'll get a good grade.
  • , and .
  • she grades

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is the sweetest lady and really cares about her students.
  • She's also offered .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 8 reviews across both formats with consistent praise and , and teaching.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1A4 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENGL1C1 review
ENGL206921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values