AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Timothy Emerick

RLG10 · RPGS2057 · PHIL5 · PHIL5RLGS5 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you can work independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationHarsh GradingUnclear AssignmentsAdministrative IssuesHeavy Writing
  • and administrative problems.
  • and harsh grading outcomes.
  • The single online review is positive, but it is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks risky because comments , and one severe grade dispute despite effort.

The only , while in-person reviews describe harsh and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course seems difficult mainly because reading and because students praise intellectual rigor.

Online evidence mentions reading effort, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Participation matters appears in tags, and one student says syllabus handling led to being dropped from the class.

Attendance and participation concerns come from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because , and careless handling of enrollment and grades.

The online review is positive, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report , and one case where straight A work allegedly ended as an F.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence strongly suggests harsh and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention reading, participation, and long APA papers that students felt were poorly explained.

Format shift

The workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most comments describe him as unhelpful, hard to reach, rude, or careless with student issues.

Format shift

The single online review is positive, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Comments focus on essays, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

Both online and and reading than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints , and rude responses.

Main concern

Students describe poor communication and .

What students said

“He is terrible at responding to emails, takes him days if .”
PHIL5
“He accidentally dropped me from the class after week 2 after I ”
PHIL5
“I was subjected to ridicule and a confrontational and .”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is positive and says he responded quickly and graded based on effort and reading.

Main concern

The evidence is too thin to know if the online experience is consistent.

What students said

“He responded to my emails in a timely manner and graded based on the effect you gave and if you did the .”
PHIL5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam style.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is terrible at responding to emails, takes him days if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He sucks as a .”

⚖️

15/100

“I received straight A's the entire semester, and .”

💬 Communication

18/100

“He is terrible at responding to emails, takes him days if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He sucks as a .
  • I was subjected to ridicule and a confrontational and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I received straight A's the entire semester, and .
  • During the 2nd week he posted an essay question and did not explain that it was acutally a 6-8 page APA formatted term-paper worth 30% of our grade.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • He responded to my emails in a timely manner and graded based on the effect you gave and if you did the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews give a , but they are old and include only one online review.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL55 reviews
PHIL5RLGS51 review
RLG101 review
RPGS20571 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1