AI Rate Professor

Political Science

donald thompson

HUM1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can work independently and do not need active instructor guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAbsent instructorEasy workPoor feedbackLow guidance
  • The only review says the work was easy.
  • The main complaint is that the instructor did not participate or provide enough presence.
  • where they stood.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The work was called easy, but the reported C grade and lack of .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course work itself appears easy, with no comments describing hard content.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

There are no online reviews, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The student disliked the lack of instructor participation and guidance despite easy work.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The review says he grades work, but the student had little sense of standing in the course.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

80/100

The only review directly says the work was easy.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

The student reports little instructor presence, participation, or guidance during the course.

Format shift

There are no online reviews, and the in-person evidence is negative but very limited.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review mentions posts, discussions, and graded work but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review describes easy work but poor instructor presence and .

Main concern

Low participation and .

What students said

“Work was easy”
HUM1
“he wasn't there during the whole course”
HUM1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Work was easy, just don't like that he wasn't there during the whole course”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching presence and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Didn't participate in posts/discussions”

📈 Workload

80/100

“Work was easy”

⚖️

45/100

“does grade your work so you have no clue where you are during the course”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Presence

  • Didn't participate in posts/discussions
  • he wasn't there during the whole course

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Work

  • Work was easy
  • does grade your work so you have no clue where you are during the course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is too thin for a stable judgment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUM11 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values