AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Kathi Brant

PSYCH5 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning independently from readings and homework.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAbsence issuesHard quizzesTerm paper finalMixed teaching qualitySelf-study risk
  • Recent reviews strongly criticize absence, lack of instruction, and feeling unprepared.
  • Older reviews are positive, calling her good or great, but they are much less current.
  • The course may become difficult when , and hard off-topic quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A looks , and face hard quizzes with limited instruction.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material becomes challenging because recent students report , and hard off-topic quizzes.

Only in-person evidence exists, and recent comments describe a much harder experience than older ones.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Student , but instructor absence appears to reduce learning value.

All evidence is in person, and it concerns instructor .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recent reviews warn that absences and lack of instruction leave students unprepared, despite older positive reviews.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person and is split by time, with recent reviews much more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Hard quizzes and student .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and but negative.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report , and self-study pressure from missed instruction.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Older reviews praise her, but recent reviews describe absence and failure to instruct as major problems.

Format shift

worse than older ones.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a term paper final.

Format shift

, and assessment evidence is varied.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with older praise but recent , and poor preparation.

Main concern

Students may feel under-taught and unprepared if class meetings are missed.

What students said

“She has been absent for a long time.”
PSYCH5
“An instructor who fails to be in class to instruct.”
PSYCH5
“I feel unprepared for the .”
PSYCH5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with hard off-topic quizzes and but .

Hard QuizzesTerm Paper Final

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a but do not prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Hard QuizzesTerm Paper Final
“The and .”
PSYCH5
“But the .”
PSYCH5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I feel unprepared for the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and assessments. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“An instructor who fails to be in class to instruct.”

📈 Course Difficulty

35/100

“The and .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

38/100

“I feel unprepared for the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher!
  • She was a good teacher.
  • An instructor who fails to be in class to instruct.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Preparation

  • She's only assigned us chapters to read and .
  • I feel unprepared for the .

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessments

  • The and .
  • But the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four reviews show a , but the sample is small and spans many years.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH54 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1