AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Wendy Chisolm

CBIS13 · CBIS29A · CBISCBIS · CCNACCNA · CBIS1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Chisolm can be a good choice for students who value clear help, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplanationsCaringHeavy Online WorkloadResponsiveMixed Experience
  • as clear, knowledgeable, caring, and helpful.
  • The one online review is strongly negative because of an overwhelming weekly workload and .
  • Course ease depends heavily on format and course version, so students should verify workload before enrolling.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students call the class easy, but the online workload can be so large that an A may require substantial effort.

Online evidence is much , while in-person-counted reviews describe easier and more supportive experiences.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The concepts can feel manageable with , but the assigned work can make the class feel demanding.

Online evidence suggests the workload makes the class difficult, while and one class was very easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews .

Neither online nor in-person evidence clearly proves an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and care, but the online workload creates a serious caution.

, while the single online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

There is , and one online review complains that the grading policy changed weekly.

Format shift

Online evidence raises grading concerns, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The online review describes many weekly essay-length tasks plus a large project, outweighing the easier comments.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is heavy and specific, while but less detailed.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students describe her as , and caring, despite one very negative online experience.

Format shift

In-person-counted reviews support strong teaching, while online evidence criticizes course management and workload.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews point , and reading assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

The online review gives the clearest assessment evidence, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing clear explanations, responsiveness, kindness, and care for learning.

Main concern

Some reviews are brief or mention online experiences despite being counted as in person by the supplied format flag.

What students said

“Wendy is a great teacher and ”
CBISCBIS
“She knows her stuff and most importantly, she cares about the student learning”
CBIS29A
“It was a very easy class, and .”
CBIS1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review describes an extremely heavy workload with , and a sudden project.

Main concern

The online workload may be overwhelming and .

What students said

“I have 10 review ?s, 1 case study, and 10 discussion ?s I have to do a week.”
CBIS13
“Each of these is at least an essay long.”
CBIS13
“ ”
CBIS13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and the clearest online .

No Quizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Online evidence says the instructor added assignment work because she did not want to do quizzes, but .

No Quizzes Mentioned
“cause she .”
CBIS13

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She knows her stuff and most importantly, she cares about the student learning and is enthusiastic about sharing her knowledge in this field of science.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Wendy is a great teacher and ”

⚠️ Online Workload

25/100

“Each of these is at least an essay long.”

👍 Recommendation Level

70/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she has a sense of humor but is also professional.
  • Wendy is a great teacher and
  • she cares about the student learning

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • I have 10 review ?s, 1 case study, and 10 discussion ?s I have to do a week.
  • Each of these is at least an essay long.
  • she just added a project that is due in 13 days

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • she will help you out alot!!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five older reviews give a mixed but usable picture, with one detailed negative online review and several positive but shorter reviews.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CBIS11 review
CBIS131 review
CBIS29A1 review
CBISCBIS1 review
CCNACCNA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values