AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Pam Creasy

ANTH1 · ANTHANTH · ANTHR102 · ANTHR1 · ANTH101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready for , and a stressful class dynamic.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRude FeedbackHeavy WorkloadHarsh GradingBiased ResponsesAvoid
  • Most reviews describe rude, unprofessional, or discouraging communication.
  • Students report heavy work and difficulty pleasing the instructor.
  • One online review is positive, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Even strong students report lower-than-expected grades, heavy work, and difficulty matching her expectations.

The online review reports an A+ with work, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course is repeatedly described as very difficult, time consuming, and demanding.

The online review says work is required, while and frustration.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students advise against taking her because of rude communication, bias, and harsh expectations.

The lone online review is positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students say she is hard to please, biased, and can give lower grades despite strong performance.

Format shift

Online evidence shows an A+ is possible, but as harsh and unpredictable.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews describe required work, research, and a time-consuming course.

Format shift

Both formats mention work, but the .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most comments describe rude, unprofessional, biased, or discouraging teaching behavior.

Format shift

The online review praises her, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize posts, discussion responses, research, and work more than exams.

Format shift

Assessment and research.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, bias, heavy work, and harsh grading.

Main concern

Students feel discouraged by public criticism and .

What students said

“This is the one to stay away from.”
ANTHR102
“She is rude.”
ANTH1
“Course is time consuming.”
ANTHANTH

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review is positive but still says work is required.

Main concern

The class is not low-effort even for a satisfied student.

What students said

“Great teacher if you're a decent student.”
ANTH1
“Work is required.”
ANTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the one to stay away from.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She should not be teaching and Barstow College should be ashamed for keeping her on.”

⚖️

10/100

“you can't please her.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Course is time consuming.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is horrible.
  • She is rude.
  • Her responses are VERY unprofessional.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I am an A student and she gave me a B even though I had an A ....
  • A lot of work required!
  • Course is time consuming.

Theme 3

💬 About Student Interaction

  • She totally rips you and she is biased.
  • .
  • publicly ridicules comments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because eight old reviews are consistent in tone, though and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ANTH14 reviews
ANTH1011 review
ANTHANTH1 review
ANTHR11 review
ANTHR1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values