AI Rate Professor

English

Dale Jensen

ENLG50 · ENGLISH4 · ENGENG · ENG50 · ENG1B · ENG1C · ENG · SPCH1 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1 · ENGLISH1C · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a strong writing teacher and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHelpfulFunnyStudent FavoriteWriting Focused
  • Most students praise him as engaging, funny, helpful, and memorable.
  • He is strict with writing mechanics and makes students work for grades.
  • A minority report inconsistency, favoritism, or ego issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students can earn strong grades, but they must work for them because , and writing quality.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The course content is manageable, but the writing standards and .

Course difficulty evidence is entirely from in-person English and speech reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online reviews exist, and in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

85/100

Most students recommend him because he is engaging, helpful, and pushes students to improve.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Multiple students call him a tough or and writing errors.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention working hard on papers and grades, but the workload is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students describe him as , and effective despite some complaints about consistency.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and grammar rather than exams.

Format shift

and speech courses.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students praising his teaching while warning that .

Main concern

The and writing mechanics.

What students said

“Professor Jensen is a ”
ENGLISH4
“ .”
ENG50
“He's a , but he MAKES you learn.”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on papers and .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's a , but he MAKES you learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He is in awesome teacher... and clear...”

⚖️

30/100

“Professor Jensen is a ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

85/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is hilarious.!!!
  • Every class was a blast!
  • and clear

Theme 2

📝 About Writing & Grades

  • He makes you work for your and is very flexible.
  • He doesn't have much tolerance for punctuation errors
  • make sure you don't write fragment sentences and put your commas where they belong.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Teacher says one things than does another.
  • plays favoritism, boring and boring
  • Too egotistical, and doesn't embrace diversity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

There are 13 reviews across many years with consistent detail about teaching style and .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG502 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG1 review
ENG11 review
ENG1B1 review
Show 6 more courses
ENG1C1 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGLISH1C1 review
ENGLISH41 review
ENLG501 review
SPCH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values