Fred Kellenberger

COMPUTERINTRO · CBISCBIS · CBIS1 · MATH50 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 18/100
RMP rating: 1.7/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 2.0

The decision

Avoid Fred Kellenberger unless you can learn independently and only need an easy beginner-level course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationLittle supportEasy contentBeginner levelAvoid for instruction

Several students describe poor support, slow responses, and little interaction.
Some course content is easy and beginner-level, especially computer basics.
Low difficulty does not offset the weak teaching experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Some courses sound very easy, but poor support can make the A depend on self-teaching rather than guidance.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is often described as easy or beginner-level, though math students still struggled without help.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students discourage taking him because he provides little support, weak communication, and ineffective instruction.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews do not .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Light

80/100

One student finished assignments far ahead, and no review describes a heavy workload.

Format shift

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students repeatedly report little instruction, poor responsiveness, and weak subject support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The clearest assessment clue mentions assignments, while .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assignments, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

about support, communication, and teaching quality despite easy content.

Main concern

Students may receive little guidance or .

What students said

“Look elsewhere for Math instruction.”
MATH50

“He provides zero support and instruction to his students”
CBIS1

“Class was extremely easy and okay to follow”
CBISCBIS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“He provides zero support and instruction to his students, rarely or never interacts with them, and .”
Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Absolutely the most incompetent and ineffective instructor I have encountered in my entire academic career.”

📨 Communication

20/100

“It took days to get a response to emails .”

📈 Course Ease

68/100

“Class was extremely easy and okay to follow did the assignments 2 weeks in advance”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

he is NOT a teacher.
Not knowledgeable about computers.
he didnt help.

Theme 2

📨 About Support and Communication

If he answers, it wont be for a !
He provides zero support and instruction to his students
It took days to get a response to emails .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

Class was extremely easy and okay to follow
did the assignments 2 weeks in advance this is for beginnig computer users.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five older reviews are mostly consistent about weak support, but they are dated and course coverage is mixed.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 52

2 out of 51

1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH502 reviews

CBIS11 review

CBISCBIS1 review

COMPUTERINTRO1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values