AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Doug Bartlett

ACCOUNTING · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Doug Bartlett looks like a strong choice from the available review, but the evidence is too limited to treat as certain.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPractical informationNice and fairGreat humorHighly recommendedEngaging teacher
  • The only review is highly enthusiastic and praises practical information.
  • The student describes him as nice, fair, and funny.
  • Credibility is low because the analysis .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The review says he is fair but does not prove an easy A or .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The course seems approachable because the teaching is practical and fair, but difficulty details are limited.

Only one in-person review provides evidence about course ease.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The student strongly recommends him because , and humorous.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

The review directly calls him fair, but it does not provide grade outcomes or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

No workload details are given, so the estimate stays neutral despite the low difficulty rating.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and workload is not described.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

The student praises his practical teaching, fairness, kindness, humor, and overall recommendation value.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe assignments, exams, projects, or .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and assessment methods are not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review is very positive, praising practical teaching, fairness, humor, and recommendation value.

Main concern

Only , so current expectations are uncertain.

What students said

“Good practical information.”
ACCOUNTING
“ , and has a great sense of humor.”
ACCOUNTING
“ !”
ACCOUNTING

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“HE ROCKS! Good practical information. , and has a great sense of humor. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Good practical information.”

⚖️

70/100

“ , and has a great sense of humor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • HE ROCKS!
  • Good practical information.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • , and has a great sense of humor.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one brief review from 2005 is available, so reliability is limited despite the positive tone.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCOUNTING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values