AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bob Pacheco

ACSK153 · ACSKMATH · ASCK153 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with portfolios and practice work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring teacherConfidence builderPortfolio heavyFair gradingActive learning
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as caring, inspiring, and focused on student success.
  • The class requires steady work, especially portfolios and practice, so the A is earned rather than automatic.
  • His grading appears fair and correcting mistakes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades seem fair and recoverable, but and practice consistently to succeed.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews counted.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The , but students still describe summer pacing, practice, and portfolios as demanding.

Only in-person evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and helps anxious math students build confidence.

, and they are consistently positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

He is described as very fair and lets students regain half of .

Format shift

This judgment .

Workload

Heavy

40/100

Portfolios, practice tests, group work, and intensive summer pacing create a meaningful workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students repeatedly praise his care, confidence building, and multiple ways of helping students learn math.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Portfolios and practice-based work are emphasized more than formal exams in the comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

for care, fairness, confidence building, and active learning.

Main concern

The main concern is the steady workload from portfolios and intensive class time.

What students said

“He wants to see his students succeed.”
ACSK153
“Portfolios are important.”
ACSK153
“He let's you earn half the wrong.”
ACSK153

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention practice tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Practice Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but specific exam policies are not clearly proven.

Practice Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ .”
ACSK153

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Before I took him passing a math class seemed hopeless”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“He uses many ways to try to get students to learn (like investigations, technology, group work).”

⚖️

80/100

“He let's you earn half the wrong.”

📚 Workload Reality

40/100

“Portfolios are important.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He wants to see his students succeed.
  • Bob is a very caring teacher and he uses many ways to try to get students to learn
  • Really wants you to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very, very fair and wants you to be successful.
  • Portfolios are important.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Super guy and really works on your confidence.
  • Bob is a great teacher/person.
  • I have enjoyed his class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews are consistent and detailed, though they are old and mostly from similar courses.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACSK1534 reviews
ACSKMATH3 reviews
ASCK1531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values