AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Rubio

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider him only if you can handle last-minute assessment changes and protect your grade carefully near the end.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringManageable WorkUnstable RequirementsRisky Final Assessment
  • The student says the professor teaches well and the work is manageable.
  • The and caused a .
  • The only review is mixed, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The workload seemed manageable, but the student dropped from a B to an F after the last assessment changed.

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course work itself sounds manageable, but assessment instability makes the experience harder.

, so no format comparison can be made.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Participation matters is tagged, but the review does not clearly prove a .

Only the online review exists, and it does not provide a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

The professor is described as good and caring, but the .

Recommendation evidence comes only from the online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The despite manageable coursework.

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Workload

Light

75/100

The student explicitly says the work was manageable.

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

The student calls him a good teacher, but the .

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The review mentions work, participation, and a .

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review praises the teaching and manageable work but reports a major last-minute assessment change that damaged the .

Main concern

A late change to the .

What students said

“He was a good teacher everything was manageable as far as the work goes.”
40737
“Professor can change the requirements of the .”
40737

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The YouTube video with questions, creating high grade risk.

Last-Minute Test Requirement ChangeVideo-Based Final Test

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review reports a last-minute change from individual meetings to a YouTube video with questions.

Last-Minute Test Requirement ChangeVideo-Based Final Test
“Professor can change the requirements of the .”
40737
“He went from having a meeting per student to uploading a video on youtube with questions to be answered.”
40737

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was at a B and my ending grade was an F.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“He was a good teacher everything was manageable as far as the work goes.”

⚠️ Grade Risk

25/100

“I was at a B and my ending grade was an F.”

📝 Assessment Style

30/100

“Professor can change the requirements of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was a good teacher everything was manageable as far as the work goes.
  • Professor can change the requirements of the .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Assessments

  • I was at a B and my ending grade was an F.
  • The YouTube dropped significantly.
  • He went from having a meeting per student to uploading a video on youtube with questions to be answered.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, and it reports one sharply mixed experience.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

407371 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values