AI Rate Professor

History

Miguel Gamboa

HIST102 · HUM105 · HIST105 · HIST120 · HUM101 · HIST0 · HUMAN105 · HIST118 · HIST108 · HIST119 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Miguel Gamboa only if you can self-manage reading-heavy work and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLate gradingReading heavyUnclear criteriaPolitical tangentsHarsh quizzes
  • Recent online reviews strongly complain that grades are posted very late.
  • Many students say success depends on reading the textbook more than learning from lectures.
  • Older reviews are more mixed, but recent comments lower confidence in the experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some older reviews call the class easy, but , and detailed quizzes make the A feel unreliable.

Online evidence is split between easy older work and recent grading problems, while and quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is usually manageable, but and .

Online reviews mention easy work but poor pacing, while survive.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

marked mandatory and many older in-person reviews not clearly stating a rule.

Online reviews include both mandatory and non-mandatory flags, while in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Recent students mostly warn against him because of , and weak course organization.

Online recent reviews are especially negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students mention , and unclear criteria, even when the work itself can be easy.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on late and , while and hard quizzes.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The , and discussions, with some classes easy and others reading-heavy.

Format shift

Online workload varies by course, while and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

37/100

Some students find him interesting, but many , and personal or political tangents.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on grading problems, while and topic drift.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and reading-based work, with no single method dominating every review.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and essays, while , and textbook-based tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a reading-heavy class with inconsistent lectures, political or personal tangents, and mixed difficulty.

Main concern

Students often feel lectures and .

What students said

“ .”
HIST102
“ .”
HUM105

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews range from one very easy older class to several recent complaints about delayed grading and .

Main concern

Grades and .

What students said

“He did not grade a class.”
HIST120
“This was the EASIEST class I've ever taken.”
HIST119

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some reviews describing hard quizzes and one older review describing a .

Hard QuizzesReading-Based TestsTake-Home Open-Book Final

Assessment risk

Varies

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention hard quizzes, tests that differ from lecture material, and .

Hard QuizzesReading-Based TestsTake-Home Open-Book Final
“He practically makes the .”
HUM101
“ because he just takes everything from the book.”
HIST105

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It was hard to even find my grade because he didn't grade a huge majority of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and lecture quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

37/100

“He rarely lectures the information needed for the assignments.”

⚖️

32/100

“ and little to no explanation to what needs to ”

📚 Reading Load

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good teacher. Kept the class interesting.
  • He tends to bring up his political and personal views a lot.
  • to do with what he teaches in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • discussions and knocked my grade down toa. 89.9% and didnt round to a B.
  • He did not grade a class.
  • He was okay. so hard but

Theme 3

📖

  • Be prepared to actually READ the book as there will be plenty of work assigned.
  • , and then coming in to class to test on the book.
  • EASY, EASY, EASY!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The 19 reviews cover a long time span, but recent reviews are few and more negative than older comments.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HIST1205 reviews
HIST1022 reviews
HIST1082 reviews
HIST1182 reviews
HUMAN1052 reviews
Show 6 more courses
300681 review
HIST01 review
HIST1051 review
HIST1191 review
HUM1011 review
HUM1051 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1