AI Rate Professor

English

Susannah Kopecky

ENG101 · ENGLISH101 · ENGL101 · ENG514 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a supportive writing class, but be cautious with online sections because .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKind and passionateEasy in personLate grading riskRevision friendlyReading heavy online
  • as , and very supportive for writing students.
  • Recent online reviews , and lack of useful feedback.
  • The A path looks easy in older in-person classes but not reliable in online sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

attendance and revisions, but online reviews show grading and feedback problems that raise risk.

In-person evidence strongly supports easy grading, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The in-person writing course is described as clear and manageable, but and .

In-person sections look beginner-friendly, while online sections mention grad-level reading and lots of .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory, and positive outcomes often depend on showing up and participating.

, and several in-person reviews also list mandatory attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

, but the recent online reviews and low stated take-again rate create major hesitation.

, while online reviews do not provide a and are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and , but online reviews describe tough grading and little feedback.

Format shift

, while online grading appears strict, delayed, and unclear.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The course usually involves essays, discussions, journals, reading, and a .

Format shift

In-person workload sounds manageable, while online reviews mention pages of and lots of discussion work.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

She is praised as , and passionate in older in-person reviews, but recent and delayed grading.

Format shift

but old, while online teaching feedback is recent and negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and research papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, but online and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, describing her as , and .

Main concern

Most in-person evidence is old, so .

What students said

“As long as you show up, she will help you get an A.”
ENGL101
“2 essays, which you can do over and over until you obtain the grade you desire, a research paper and a couple of journals.”
ENG514
“She let the students review and as many times as needed up until the last week.”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, , and weak feedback.

Main concern

Students may not know their grade or .

What students said

“None of us know what grade we're getting here at the end because she's totally refusing to grade us or .”
ENGLISH101
“ for .”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

or proctoring burden, though online grading feedback is a concern.

No Tests MentionedEssaysResearch PaperDiscussion AssignmentsNo Clear Online Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

section and emphasize essays, rewrites, journals, and a research paper.

No TestsEssaysResearch PaperRevision Friendly
“ .”
ENG514
“2 and a .”
ENG514

Online

Online reviews mention discussions and essays but do not clearly prove any .

Discussion AssignmentsEssaysNo Clear Exam Policy
“ for .”
ENG101
“ and just half of the discussions.”
ENGLISH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She honestly believes everyone can get an A and there's really no reason not to in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting the split between older in-person praise and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“ and in multiple different ways.”

⚖️

60/100

“None of us know what grade we're getting here at the end because she's totally refusing to grade us or .”

📝 Assignment Style

15/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and in multiple different ways.
  • She is such a kind and understanding teacher.
  • Ms. Kopecky is a really engaging professor!

Theme 2

📚 About Work And Grades

  • As long as you show up, she will help you get an A.
  • She let the students review and as many times as needed up until the last week.
  • for .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Concerns

  • Assigns pages of grad-level reading.
  • She gave me low grades without showing me what I needed to work on.
  • None of us know what grade we're getting here at the end because she's totally refusing to grade us or .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 12 reviews, but and the two recent online reviews strongly conflict with it.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
ENG5142 reviews
97803126726211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1