AI Rate Professor

English

Julia Raybould-Rodgers

ENGL512 · ENGL506 · ENGLISH512 · ENG103 · READ110 · ENGL103 · ENGLISH103 · ENG41030 · ENG514 · ENG101 · ENG512 · ENGL300 · ENG112102 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
46.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you are ready for frequent reading, writing, and discussion work; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadEssay intensiveMixed gradingHelpful when engagedPolarizing
  • The , and frequent assignments.
  • some praise her feedback and flexibility, while and .
  • The course can reward steady writers, but it is a poor fit for students seeking a light general education English class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

A grades are common when students complete all work, but the volume of writing and A.

Online evidence is more volatile with both easy-A claims and severe workload complaints, while and participation determine success.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material is often not described as conceptually hard, but the , and .

Online courses are especially workload-heavy in short terms, while and writing demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

46/100

, and often functionally important because participation and assignments matter.

Online reviews vary by course setup, while required for success.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

and challenge, but many warn against the workload and grading experience.

Both formats are polarized, with online reviews showing the sharpest split between strong praise and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

, and extensions, but many others report tough, picky, or .

Format shift

Online reviews include AI accusation and , while and unfair grading complaints.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of homework, many papers, weekly quizzes, long discussions, and .

Format shift

Both formats are heavy, with online short-term classes described as especially intense.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is praised as helpful and caring by some students, but , and poor feedback experiences.

Format shift

Online teaching is more polarized, while recent negative reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven mainly by essays, discussion posts, , and occasional quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews stress essays, quizzes, and discussion posts; , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews also show a heavy-work pattern, but , and passing through steady participation.

Main concern

Students report lots of , and inconsistent grading experiences.

What students said

“ but they're all fairly easy to complete.”
ENG101
“Professor grades unfair, gives lots of ”
ENG101
“All you have to do is do all the work in time and you will get an A.”
ENG514

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are polarized, with some students praising clear rubrics and growth while , and grading disputes.

Main concern

The online workload can become overwhelming, especially in short terms.

What students said

“There's at least 6-10 assignments a week all due by the weekend.”
ENG103
“If you put in the work and follow the .”
ENG103
“ and so one claim hurts a lot.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk appears lower than workload risk because reviews mostly describe essays, discussions, projects, and .

Few Or No TestsWeekly QuizzesFinal Project Or Final EssayAssignment Heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly mention no tests in one class and , but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or proctoring.

No Tests MentionedPapersAssignmentsParticipation
“ , and .”
ENG101
“Lots of discussions, and .”
ENG103
“Be prepared for a lot of reading, writing, and annotating.”
ENG514

Online

Online reviews clearly mention weekly quizzes, essays, discussion posts, and a final in one older review, but do not clearly prove .

Weekly QuizzesEssaysDiscussion PostsFinal Mentioned
“There's also a weekly quiz.”
ENG103
“ and ”
ENG103
“ ”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor is SO , but the work is really extensive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

Workload

18/100

“There's at least 6-10 assignments a week all due by the weekend.”

Teaching Quality

55/100

“ .”

Recommendation Risk

47/100

“ .”

Theme 1

About Workload

  • So .
  • She required way too much work.
  • Be prepared for a lot of reading, writing, and annotating.

Theme 2

About Grades

  • If you put in the work and follow the .
  • your grade comes down to whether or not she really likes your writing..
  • Professor grades unfair, gives lots of

Theme 3

About Teaching Style

  • This professor is wonderful! If you like to write then this class is for you.
  • She is an amazing teacher and .
  • makes the TA do all the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 42 reviews cover both formats and many years, with consistent evidence of heavy workload despite mixed opinions on teaching quality.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG10317 reviews
ENG1018 reviews
ENGLISH1033 reviews
ENG5122 reviews
ENG5142 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ENGL1032 reviews
5141 review
ENG112-1021 review
ENG410301 review
ENGL3001 review
ENGL5061 review
ENGL5121 review
ENGLISH5121 review
READ1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 7

B range

9

B+ 5 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5