AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Julie Vasques

PSY101 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
56.67%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you prioritize a possible easy grade and can tolerate serious organization and communication risk.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarized reviewsOrganization problemsCommunication concernsEasy gradesPossible fake-review concern
  • The review set is sharply split between glowing praise and severe complaints about organization, automation, and communication.
  • Grades are often high, so getting an A may be easier than the student experience suggests.
  • Credibility is reduced because multiple comments directly accuse the review pattern of being fake or generic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students report A-range grades and low difficulty, but , and communication problems can still create avoidable risk.

Both formats show many A grades, while online reviews add and course setup.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The psychology content often appears easy, but , and quiz wording make the experience less smooth.

Online reviews emphasize platform and quiz confusion, while and severe complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews mark attendance as mandatory, although .

Online evidence is mixed, while as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is unstable because enthusiastic praise is offset by detailed warnings about disorganization, poor communication, and suspected fake reviews.

Both formats are polarized, but online reviews contain more specific operational complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

A-range grades are common even in negative reviews, but some students report and .

Format shift

Both formats show high grades, while and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is usually manageable, but weekly assignments, quizzes, readings, and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly quizzes and assignments, while .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

kindness and support but repeated complaints about incoherent communication and poor organization.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest negative pattern about automation and course setup, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention weekly assignments, quizzes, tests, and occasional final timing issues, so assessment appears .

Format shift

Online reviews give clearer assessment details, while in-person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

for kindness and setup with severe complaints about professionalism, dates, and communication.

Main concern

Credibility and consistency are weak because praise and severe complaints directly conflict.

What students said

“ and when I had to travel out of the country with my daughter.”
PSY101
“emails and responses were incoherent, syllabus changed 3 x without letting anyone know and .”
PSY101
“Horrible professor to communicate with. .”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are highly polarized, with many positive comments about support but many detailed complaints about confusing due dates, poor communication, automated work, and quiz issues.

Main concern

and unreliable communication.

What students said

“ and with the wrong due dates.”
PSY101
“ and .”
PSY101
“There are weekly short assignments as well as !). There is .”
PSY101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with weekly quizzes clearly mentioned online and .

Weekly QuizzesNo Final/MidtermFinal Timing Confusion

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test Heavy
“Horrible professor to communicate with. . Has the .”
PSY101

Online

Online reviews mention weekly multiple-choice quizzes, in one section, and , but do not prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Weekly Multiple-Choice QuizzesNo Final/MidtermFinal Timing Confusion
“When it was time for testing which is every week multiple choice questions it was more like a syllabus hunt!”
PSY101
“There are weekly short assignments as well as !). There is .”
PSY101
“ yet her announcements showed it for .”
PSY101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and with the wrong due dates.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and credibility. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“This professor has very poor communication and organization skills which are important for running an online class.”

📈 Easy Grade Signal

82/100

“Overall, the class was fairly easy and I will be taking more in the future.”

⚠️ Credibility Risk

38/100

“It's unfortunate to see many fake reviews all posted on January 20th 2025.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing instructor.
  • Unfortunately, she was unavailable to students, often relying on AI-generated responses to emails.
  • Absolutely non existent.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are as well as !).
  • Overall, the class was fairly easy and I will be taking more in the future.
  • The book was included with inclusive learning but was online (not good for testing).

Theme 3

📨 About Organization & Communication

  • Her emails were never up to date so .
  • and with the wrong due dates.
  • This instructor was on top of her emails.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews give volume, but credibility is reduced by clustered praise, generic wording, direct fake-review accusations, and sharply conflicting claims.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 512

Course coverage

PSY10130 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 5 · A 17 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1