AI Rate Professor

English

Ryan Meza

Courses not reported · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and can handle possible inconsistency in class management.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong FeedbackCaring When It WorksPolarizing PersonalityReading And Writing HeavyUneven Organization
  • , and a manageable path to pass.
  • Negative reviews describe rude behavior, favoritism, disorganization, and tough experiences for struggling students.
  • The class can be an easy A for self-motivated students, but the student experience is unusually polarized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is possible with , and revisions, but weak organization and grading complaints add risk.

Online evidence is more clearly manageable, while because some students report favoritism and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The material is not usually described as conceptually hard, but the , and group work require steady effort.

Online reviews emphasize staying on track, while classroom issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

saying it is not mandatory and others marking it mandatory.

Online evidence is split, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and a chill class, but several negative reviews warn about rudeness and inconsistency.

Online reviews are strongly recommended, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He allows resubmissions and , but and poor support when they fall behind.

Format shift

Online grading sounds more supportive, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is manageable but , and participation, with one online review calling it a lot of reading and writing.

Format shift

Online workload is reading and writing heavy, while and classroom structure.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

, but multiple reviews describe rude behavior, disorganization, and poor support.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is consistently positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews mostly discuss reading, writing, essays, revisions, participation, and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Online and , with only one in-person review mentioning test-heavy work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between students who find him chill and helpful and students who describe him as rude or disorganized.

Main concern

The and treatment of struggling students.

What students said

“If you want a chill teacher with .”
21739
“Very uncoordinated with work, always changed the desk arrangement.”
21739
“Near the end of the semester he became very rude and dismissive to me as well as some other students.”
21739

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive and say the course is manageable with , and feedback.

Main concern

The main online concern is keeping up with reading and writing.

What students said

“It is a lot of reading and writing but it helped me become a way better writer and understand MLA format.”
21739
“It is not a tough course as long as you stay on track.”
21739

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly establish a , and most assessment evidence is about writing assignments rather than exams.

Writing AssignmentsResearch EssayGroup ProjectsTest Heavy Mention

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mostly discuss papers, participation, and projects, with one review tagging the course as test heavy but .

Research EssayGroup ProjectsTest Heavy Mention
“Professor meza would offer great feedback when we and everything leading up to it.”
21739
“ ”
21739

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's amazing with improve on!”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized classroom experience; credibility rating: Medium.

📝

78/100

“ and allows resubmission on some assignments if .”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

64/100

“If you want a chill teacher with .”

⚠️ Classroom Risk

40/100

“Near the end of the semester he became very rude and dismissive to me as well as some other students.”

Theme 1

📝

  • and allows resubmission on some assignments if .
  • He's amazing with improve on!
  • Professor meza would offer great feedback when we and everything leading up to it.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • It was an easy class, just try to keep up with the reading material.
  • It is a lot of reading and writing but it helped me become a way better writer and understand MLA format.
  • It is not a tough course as long as you stay on track.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Very uncoordinated with work, always changed the desk arrangement.
  • If you weren't one of his fav students you where hated.
  • Caused students to leave his class and very uninspiring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

67/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 recent reviews give useful detail, but the opinions are highly polarized and the sample is small.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

2173911 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values