AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Feride Schroeder

PHSC112 · GEOL114 · CHEM120 · GEOLOGY141 · PHSC111 · GEOL100 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want to learn deeply and can , and a demanding classroom tone.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadStrict gradingLecture heavyHelpful when engagedPolarizing personality
  • Students often earn A grades, but , and .
  • Teaching reviews are sharply split between helpful and .
  • The biggest , and a tense classroom experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students report A grades, but the A , and exam preparation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content is , and difficult for students without strong science preparation.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Some reviews say attendance was not mandatory, but .

, and it varies by course and term.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend her when they value structure and learning, but many warn against her because of , and communication style.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students repeatedly mention tough grading, , and limited recovery from bad exam scores.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and heavy summer pacing.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Some students praise her clarity and feedback, but many describe rushed lectures, poor explanations, or rude interactions.

Format shift

All and is highly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of , and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, which show a demanding and polarizing professor with real learning value for prepared students.

Main concern

Heavy workload and an easy science credit.

What students said

“The workload in this class is unrealistic.”
GEOL100
“ , but i learned a lot in this class.”
PHSC111
“ if youre lazy.”
CHEM120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, midterms, tests, and practice midterms, but they do .

MidtermsWeekly QuizzesTestsPractice MidtermsCurve Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests, but do not clearly prove the .

MidtermsWeekly QuizzesTestsPractice Midterms
“The 2 last midterms, she gives a .”
PHSC111
“as long as you do the hw and and labs.”
GEOL100
“You have two test the ”
GEOLOGY141

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if youre lazy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and classroom tone; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She goes over everything you will be tested on and .”

⚖️

32/100

“ and small mistakes.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“The workload in this class is unrealistic.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectures really fast so .
  • and .
  • Lectures frequently drift into long, unrelated tangents

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if youre lazy.
  • You need to read, do the homework, and online quizzes.
  • The .

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • She is disrespectful and degrades students.
  • She wants the students to understand the material and succeed.
  • When you ask for help, shes rude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 22 reviews across many years with detailed and , and teaching style.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 58
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHEM1207 reviews
PHSC1115 reviews
GEOL1004 reviews
GEOLOGY1413 reviews
GEOL1142 reviews
Show 1 more courses
PHSC1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

2

B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1