AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jenise Coates

ANTH102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a caring professor and a and participation matter.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear ScheduleExtra CreditGood FeedbackReading Required
  • Students strongly praise her as caring and effective.
  • The course is manageable if students read and keep up with .
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A is realistic with reading, participation, and , but the .

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course is not described as easy because specific quizzes and reading are important.

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and participation matters.

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Both students recommend , and overall quality.

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and , though quizzes require careful reading.

Format shift

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload appears moderate because reading, participation, and specific quizzes matter.

Format shift

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students describe her as , and one of .

Format shift

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

, and online quizzes, with no clear exam-heavy pattern.

Format shift

All counted evidence comes from in person reviews because onlineReviewCount is 0.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are very positive and emphasize clear structure, caring support, feedback, participation, and .

Main concern

, so students need to read carefully.

What students said

“Schedule for the and she did well in reviewing the assignments for class.”
ANTH102
“I found the , but if you read you'll be fine.”
ANTH102
“One of the ”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The very specific, while exam policies are not clearly proven.

Specific Online Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention specific online quizzes, but do not clearly prove .

Specific Online Quizzes
“I found the , but if you read you'll be fine.”
ANTH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Schedule for the and she did well in reviewing the assignments for class.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“One of the ”

📈 Grade Path

74/100

“I found the , but if you read you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Jenise was great.
  • Overall, a and willing to work with you.
  • One of the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I found the , but if you read you'll be fine.
  • Schedule for the and she did well in reviewing the assignments for class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because though both are recent and strongly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values